LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Sound modeling expert testifies in Penn Forest wind turbine hearing 

Credit:  By Justin Sweitzer | WFMZ | Oct 10, 2018 | www.wfmz.com ~~

PENN FOREST TWP., Pa. – An expert in sound modeling testified at Tuesday evening’s Penn Forest Township zoning hearing regarding an application for 28 wind turbines in the township.

Robert O’Neal, a principal at the Massachusetts-based environmental consulting firm Epsilon Associates, bolstered the sound modeling conducted by Atlantic Wind LLC, adding that he believes the turbines will be compliant with township restrictions that require them to be no louder than 45 decibels.

O’Neal testified that Atlantic Wind’s sound modeling utilizes the industry standard metric for decibel levels. He added that the Leq metric used in Atlantic Wind’s modeling is widely accepted for wind energy projects due to its ability to separate turbine noise from noise from other sources.

O’Neal testified that the Leq metric measures sound levels over a period of time, rather than spikes in sound. This metric is is used most often in measuring wind turbine sound, he said.

“The Leq is by far the most often used metric in the field of acoustics.” O’Neal said. “It’s the most stable, reliable metric.”

His testimony contradicted that of Robert Rand, another acoustic expert who testified on behalf of objectors to the project back in July. Rand testified that Atlantic Wind’s sound models should have used a metric called Lmax, which measures the highest sound levels of a noise source.

O’Neal said the Lmax metric is better suited for “short duration events,” unlike the continuous nature of wind turbine operation. The Leq metric, he said, can measure the sound coming specifically from the turbine itself, whereas the Lmax metric picks up on all sounds. O’Neal suggested this improperly skews the real sound level of the turbine.

In July, Rand said that an Leq doesn’t take into account the spikes in sound that come from wind turbines. O’Neal disagreed with that line of thought, adding that the Leq is a “very conservative” metric that positively skews toward higher decibel levels.

Attorney Bruce Anders looked to discredit O’Neal’s insistence of the Leq metric during cross-examination, pointing to court rulings that favored the Lmax metric in municipalities with ordinances similar to Penn Forest Township.

Additionally, Anders referenced modeling conducted by O’Neal’s own colleagues that utilized the Lmax metric for sound modeling, despite O’Neal’s skepticism of the metric.

O’Neal believes that the turbines will comply with the township ordinance. He said that even if they exceed 45 decibels, there are options Atlantic Wind can take to reduce their decibel level, such as using low noise trailing edge blades. He also said control centers will continuously monitor the operation of each wind turbine if approved, which could allow them to adjust the sound of a turbine, if needed.

When questioned about the topic by Township Solicitor Thomas Nanovic, O’Neal noted that the control centers don’t measure the sound specifically, but measure operations that could impact the sound.

“Whatever they’re monitoring, they’re not monitoring the sound generated by the wind turbine,” Nanovic observed.

“No they’re not,” O’Neal said.

The next hearing will take place on Tuesday, Oct. 30 at the Penn Forest Township Fire Company #1.

Source:  By Justin Sweitzer | WFMZ | Oct 10, 2018 | www.wfmz.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon