[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Highland village ‘won’t be encircled’ by wind turbines 

Credit:  The Press and Journal | October 9, 2018 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

The prospective developer of a large wind farm yesterday denied its plans would leave a Caithness village beset on all sides by turbines.

Objectors to Eon’s scheme at Golticlay, near Lybster, believes it would leave residents encircled by whirling blades on land and at sea.

Councillors formally objected to the plans last September, highlighting concerns about the negative impact on local osprey and rare wildcat populations, resulting in an inquiry.

But the energy giant insists its proposed 19-turbine cluster satisfies the guidelines and could be accommodated within the landscape without undue problems.

Speaking on the first day of a public local inquiry into the plans, Eon consultant Jon Mason said the development is sited in an area where wind farms are “likely to be acceptable,” under Scottish planning policy.

Mr Mason said the layout of the turbines is “as well balanced and evenly spaced as possible in a majority of views.”

Objectors fear the development, when taken together with the existing Burn of Whilk and onshore farms and the hundreds being erected immediately off the east Caithness coast, will lead to Lybster being “encircled” by the towers.

But Mr Mason, a landscape architect, said the Golticlay turbines, which would stand up to 425 feet high, would not be visually prominent from the majority of views or from the affected settlement.

He said: “Neither Burn of Whilk nor the BOWL offshore project is visible from a majority of the settlement either.

“Those locations where all three developments would be visible are in the minority.

“The different distances and directions to the respective wind farms and the greatly different context of the offshore turbines, are such that while there would be a greater presence and perception of turbines, this would not be to a harmful degree.”

Mr Mason did not believe the development would, as objectors allege, blight the local stretch of the North Coast 500.

He said the turbines, where visible from the A99 and A9, would be set back from the roads and clearly visible only for relatively short sections north of Latheronwheel and south of Wick.

He told the inquiry many wind farms are already very visible from the route and have been since before it was launched. “They have not inhibited its success,” he said.

Neither he said would the scheme detract from the view presented by the Camster Cairns.

He accepted the blades of 14 of the turbines would be partially seen in the background but he pointed out that the Neolothic relic is surrounded by a commercial forestry plantation and other modern features.

Mr Mason said the hub of one turbine has lowered below the horizon to minimise the impact of the venture, which he maintained would be acceptable.

The inquiry was triggered after Highland Council last year objected to Eon’s plans, which also attracted 260 objections.

The inquiry in Mackays Hotel, Wick, is expected to run until Friday.

Source:  The Press and Journal | October 9, 2018 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky