LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plympton-Wyoming mayor calls for wind companies to pay more 

Credit:  Paul Morden | The Observer | October 7, 2018 | www.theobserver.ca ~~

The mayor of Plympton-Wyoming wants Ontario’s new government to change the rules so wind turbine owners pay higher property taxes.

Mayor Lonny Napper recently received the backing of town council to ask the province to review how property assessments are set for the 20 wind turbines operating in Plympton-Wyoming.

“The taxation on turbines is very unfair,” Napper said.

“Whether you oppose them or like them, that’s not the issue. The issue is fair taxation.”

Plympton-Wyoming received a total of just over $34,000 in property taxes in 2018 from the 20 turbines in the municipality. They are part of the 46-turbine Cedar Point Wind Energy project owned by Florida-based NextEra Energy and Fiera Infrastructure Inc.

Napper said he believes the property assessment value assigned to wind turbines in Ontario is too low compared to other property.

Paula Chung, with the province’s Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, said wind turbines are assessed using a rate Ontario’s Ministry of Finance set at $50,460. That figure is then multiplied by the installed electricity generating capacity of each turbine.

Napper said the assessed value of wind turbines is out of whack when compared to other industrial properties, such as natural gas and oil pipelines, or agricultural grain elevators.

“Most of that money is going out of the country, and I just think it would be a win-win situation for every municipality to have those tax dollars,” Napper said.

He added that is particularly true in rural communities, where Ontario’s wind turbines have been built.

Napper said that now that Ontario has “scrapped” the Green Energy Act, “I’m hoping there’s an avenue there were they’d scrap this taxation and put it on fair playing field.”

The amount of municipal property taxes wind turbine companies currently pay is “peanuts,” Napper said.

“We’ve got houses that are paying more than they are.”

Napper said he plans to talk about the issue with Sarnia-Lambton MPP Bob Bailey and Monte McNaughton, who is Ontario’s infrastructure minister as well as MPP in neighbouring Lambton-Kent-Middlesex.

Bailey said he’s prepared to take Napper’s concerns to the finance minister but added that he doesn’t want any change leading to higher electricity bills for residents.

“We’re working to get the rates down,” Bailey said.

“But, I’m willing to take a look at it.”

Brandy Giannetta, an Ontario director with the Canadian Wind Energy Association, said in an e-mail the group representing the wind industry believes Ontario’s current approach is a “fair and appropriate process.”

She said the assessment for turbines was increased in 2014 and will be updated as part of the province’s system for re-assessing property.

Giannetta said that along with the assessment on turbines, operators are typically billed at the industrial property tax rate for approximately an acre of land per turbine.

“It’s not appropriate for a municipality to single out wind energy projects in an effort to garner additional revenues,” she wrote.

“Any increase in the assessments of property must be accompanied by consultation and a strong rationale that does not impose unjustified hardship on wind energy operators that continue to provide long-term economic benefits to the municipalities in which they operate.”

Source:  Paul Morden | The Observer | October 7, 2018 | www.theobserver.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky