[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Commission given report on county’s proposed wind energy regulations 

Credit:  Tony Herrman | Hastings Tribune | Sep 6, 2018 | www.hastingstribune.com ~~

Members of the Adams County Planning and Zoning Commission are looking to change the county’s wind energy regulations.

While they couldn’t take action on the changes during their regular meeting Tuesday because the changes to wind regulations was presented during the staff report, the board discussed changes proposed by a committee of commissioners: Chairman Dean Rolls, Bob Hansen, Mike Allen and Ken Lukasiewicz.

The county started discussing in December 2017 changes to wind power regulations.

The commission formed the committee to look at updating wind regulation during its August meeting.

Zoning Administrator Judy Mignery provided commissioners in August with the existing Adams County regulations as well as regulations from Custer, Merrick, Lincoln, Antelope and Knox counties.

Wind regulations for all those counties are pretty similar.

Adams County small wind energy systems regulations limit tower heights at 80 feet for properties between half an acre and one acre.

Adams County regulations state maximum heights shall be determined by the fall zone and shall not exceed 100 feet. No other counties included here have that requirement.

All the counties also have similar regulations for commercial wind energy systems.

However, towers in Adams County shall not exceed 300 feet for the tower and 400 feet for the entire structure.

Hastings attorney Mike Sullivan spoke on the issue at the commission’s August meeting, representing Omaha firm Bluestem Energy Solutions.

He said most commercial towers are 500 feet or more. Even a taller height restriction soon could be obsolete.

Any wind power project would require a conditional use permit and be taken on a case-by-case basis and would require county approval.

Changes proposed by the committee eliminate the height restriction.

Among other recommended changes was a volume restriction of 50 decibels, down from 60 to be consistent with the other counties surveyed.

Also proposed was increasing the setback distance from neighboring dwellings from 1,000 to 2,400 feet.

“I guess what we’re looking for more than anything else is if everybody’s comfortable with the regulation and the way it’s written here,” Rolls said about the proposed changes.

The committee members did not want to dictate to the rest of the commission, he said, what action should be taken.

Mignery also brought up a regulation in Antelope County limiting the number of towers around non-participant property.

Dave Bergin, deputy Adams County Attorney, recommended, from a legal standpoint, keeping the regulation as simple as possible. But if that’s a concern for the commissioners they should include it because they’re the policy holders.

“What I’m saying is that it might be better to keep it as simple as possible and then if that became a problem in the future then you could change it,” he said.

The commissioners also discussed adding requirements restoring public infrastructure to preconstruction state as part of the decommissioning process.

Mignery said including that requirement as part of the conditional use permit would be the best fit for that.

She will make changes to the requirement and present them for approval at the Oct. 1 meeting. If there are additional changes commissioners could be made by formal amendment then.

Source:  Tony Herrman | Hastings Tribune | Sep 6, 2018 | www.hastingstribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon