[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Hanover Board votes down wind turbine height resolution  

Credit:  Jo Ward | Observer | Aug 28, 2018 | www.observertoday.com ~~

HANOVER – People from Fredonia to Forestville to Sinclairville filled the court room in Hanover Town Hall Monday evening as citizens awaited the long anticipated vote on the wind turbine heights.

“The manufacturer of the turbines (that are) supposed to be used in this project, has recommended that those workmen who are working on these machines, should maintain a safety clearance of over 1,300-feet, should there be a turbine malfunction. Yet we have town ordinances that call for turbines being placed only a 1,000-feet from homes,” Dr. Mark Twitchell of Fredonia stated.

“RES’ noise assessment fails to address the biggest reason for complaints, that is low frequency noise, vibrations and amplitude modulation. To me, that seems grossly negligent,” Joni Riggle, of Sinclairville said. “All these impacts have to be measured, it’s a glaring omission.”

“Folks are watching the neighboring townships, just how things are going here, people around the country, in some of these areas that want to be developed are finding out this isn’t the sweet cookie deal that it all sounds,” Bill Moran, of Pomfret added.

Susan Baldwin, of Villenova, mentioned the impact on homeowners’ insurance turbines have.Diane Clarke, of Portland, cited in her opinion, the lack of consideration being made to wildlife and the ecosystem by the turbines, as well as their foundations and powerlines. John Robinson, of Forestville, worried over the no trespass zones and wasted frontage that’ll be added to the area due to the turbines requiring more clearance should one fail or fall.

After the public spoke, the resolution came down the line for a final vote that would adopt local laws increasing the maximum height and required setbacks for the turbines, amending the wind overlay district in the town and granting Ball Hill’s application for modification of its special use permit.

The motion was given, seconded, and all four councilpersons and the town supervisor all voted no.

The result of this vote means that the wind turbines in the town of Villenova will stand at a maximum height of 599-feet whereas the turbines in the town of Hanover will remain at a maximum of 495-feet. This vote also means that, as it stands, the additional substation and the overhead lines will remain as well.

Mark Lyons, RES project manager, stated that he’s still eyeing the long-term goals of the project and said that RES, a 150-year old, family-owned company, embraces innovation and change and like them, he wants the project to succeed and the communities to benefit. He wants to reiterate that the project is moving forward, just now with two different height maximums.

Source:  Jo Ward | Observer | Aug 28, 2018 | www.observertoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: