LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Missouri to allow state’s third largest regulated utility to move aggressively toward wind power 

The Missouri Public Service Commission (PSC) has given initial approval for the state’s third-largest regulated utility, Empire District, to build a major wind farm to generate power.

In a statement, the PSC said, “the Commission has granted Empire certain accounting and depreciation treatment related to the CSP (Empire’s proposal known as it’s “Customer Savings Plan”)as well as a variance from the Commission’s affiliate transaction rule.”

Joplin based Empire will have to make another presentation before the commission before being granted authority to construct a farm to create 600 megawatts of wind power.

Empire initially planned to shut down its coal-fired plant which generates 213 megawatts but has agreed to leave the facility in southwest Missouri’s Asbury open for the near term. The utility had said shuttering the operation could have affected approximately 50 jobs there.

The PSC noted in its statement that Empire would generate customer savings of approximately $169 million over 20 years and approximately $295 million over 30 years.

In a proposal, Empire determined the $1 billion project would save residential customers $9.33 per month or nearly $112 per year in energy costs for the 20-year period.

Although there’s no question that wind is a far cleaner source of energy than coal, there’s been strong opposition to the plan from the state Office of Public Counsel and the City of Joplin.

The Office of Public Counsel is charged with serving the interests of customers and is concerned about the impact of the project on ratepayers. Geoff Marke is the Chief Economist with the Counsel. He claims rosy predictions of customer savings is based on unrealistic projections by Empire that it’ll be able to sell excess generation of wind power on the open market at a high price.

“The market is being inundated with wind as we speak,” said Marke. “Wind is coming online and it’s coming online at an increasingly fast clip. I don’t think they’re modeling it correctly. I don’t think they’re modeling for as much in penetration of wind as is going to come online.”

Marke notes a proposal by American Electric Power (AEP) in Oklahoma called Wind Catcher would generate 2,000-megawatts. “It’s huge,” Marke said. “It’ll be the largest wind project in the United States. If that goes forward, the sheer presence of Wind Catcher will depress the market valuation of the Empire project.”

Another concern for the Office of Public Counsel is what Marke refers to as a “stranded asset” with the existing coal-fired plant. Ratepayers are on the hook for any lingering costs attributed to the plant if it’s retired from service. And already figured into their rates is a $119 million investment Empire made in 2013 to install equipment to cut emissions and make the operation more efficient.

Empire was purchased by Toronto based Algonquin Liberty in late 2016 for $3.2 billion.

The wind farm project, which comes with generous federal tax credits that expire in 2020, provides an opportunity for Algonquin to make a healthy return on investment. The PSC allows most projects by regulated utilities, which are investor-owned corporations, to realize a 9-10% profit.

Empire customers saw their rates increase by a massive 63.23% for a total of almost $182 million in the decade before Algonquin Liberty acquired it. Marke with the Office of Public Counsel doesn’t think the utility’s plan to build a wind farm will help Empire customers who already have some of the highest electric bills in the state. “They’re likely to get much higher now from our office’s perspective and our calculations.”

After being granted initial approval from the PSC for the wind farm, Empire is expected to apply for a permit to built it in the next few weeks.

The environmental group Renew Missouri is applauding the decision by the PSC. The group’s executive director, James Owen, says the economics of wind now make it impossible to avoid considering. “Wind is so cheap right now that to build a wind farm and shut down a coal plant is actually now cheaper for ratepayers than to keep a coal plant running,” said Owen.

He thinks opposition to the wind farm at the Office of Public Counsel (OPC) is a result of a political agenda established by former Governor Eric Greitens. “Unfortunately, we have people like the OPC which are leftovers from the Greitens administration who seem to view renewable energy as some sort of liberal pixie dust when it actually can be used to be something that’s beneficial for customers, Owen said.

Owens himself actually held the position of Public Counsel within the office but was fired by Greitens shortly after he took office in early 2017.

Empire is looking for a site to build its wind farm in southwest Missouri. Andy Knott with the Missouri Chapter of the Sierra Club, a prominent environmental organization, questions why the city of Joplin would oppose the project.

“Empire is proposing to build at least some of these wind farms in that same region, which will mean job creation for the area around Joplin,” said Knott. “It seems a little short-sighted that the city of Joplin was opposing something that’s going to create jobs in their region.”

Empire District also serves customer regionally in three other states – Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas. According to the PSC, Empire serves approximately 151,700 electric customers in the Missouri counties of Barry, Barton, Cedar, Christian, Dade, Dallas, Greene, Hickory, Jasper, Lawrence, McDonald, Newton, Polk, St. Clair, Stone, and Taney.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky