[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Atlantic Wind attorney implies expert in Penn Forest is biased  

Credit:  By Justin Sweitzer | WFMZ | August 14, 2018 | www.wfmz.com ~~

PENN FOREST TWP., Pa. – The legal team representing Atlantic Wind LLC, a wind-focused subsidiary of Avangrid Renewables looking to place 28 wind turbines in Penn Forest Township, cross-examined a local civil engineer Monday night in an attempt to reveal any biases held and discredit his status as an expert in the hearing.

Phil Malitsch, a professional engineer with Hanover Engineering and an objector to the project, faced cross-examination from attorney Edward Greene, who represented Atlantic Wind and looked to capitalize on Malitsch’s local ties.

Malitsch, in addition to being an objector to the current project and a party in an ongoing appeal against a project approving 40 turbines in the township, is also a township resident who lives within close proximity of where the proposed turbines would be located.

Greene suggested that Malitsch’s testimony as an expert could be biased due to his status as a township resident. Greene asked Malitsch if he was poised to experience a financial loss or gain from the potential installation of wind turbine.

Malitsch said he didn’t feel qualified to answer due to his lack of knowledge on real estate values.

“I don’t feel comfortable answering that. I think the potential is there to gain and I think the potential is there certainly to lose,” Malitsch said. “I think the board should consider that.”

Greene also pointed to a letter that Malitsch wrote to Penn Forest Township regarding Atlantic Wind’s first application. Greene said the letter displays Malitsch’s “personal opposition to this use within this district.”

Malitsch said that Greene’s characterization wasn’t accurate.

“He opposes the use of a wind turbine, the wind turbine use, on this Bethlehem Water Authority Property, and he raises a host of personal reasons why he opposes that use,” Greene said. “And yet he comes in here, offered as an expert witness to offer independent opinion, unbiased and so forth, when he in fact writes this 11-page letter expressly opposing such a use on this same property.”

Malitsch said that his letter was objective and factual, adding that he believes the application for the wind turbines doesn’t meet township zoning requirements.

“My goal with this was not to be subjective in any way, and I think given the litany of ordinance citations in this correspondence, it does demonstrate that,” he said. “The goal here was to demonstrate, very similar to this application, that I don’t think that this application can be approved without certain relief from the zoning ordinance.”

Malitsch said he believes that Atlantic Wind would need variances for the application to comply with the township’s zoning ordinance.

Neither Greene nor Atlantic Wind commented on that claim.

The cross-examination lasted through all three hours of the hearing and will continue at the next hearing.

Zoning Hearing Board Chairwoman Audrey Wargo said the board is tentatively scheduling the next hearing for Sept. 10, but that the date needs to be agreed upon and confirmed by all parties.

Source:  By Justin Sweitzer | WFMZ | August 14, 2018 | www.wfmz.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.