LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge reverses zoning board’s OK of solar farm in Portsmouth 

[Judge Brian] Van Couyghen cited a previous case in which the state Supreme Court found that wind turbines represented a manufacturer because they are used for the sole purpose of transforming raw materials, "namely wind — into a finished product — namely electricity." "Thus, even though the [zoning] board found that the proposed solar farm was similar to a public utility, it would be, in fact, a manufacturing facility because it would transform sunlight into electricity ... manufacturing is expressly prohibited in residential zones under the ordinance. As a result, the granting of a special use permit for a manufacturing facility — the solar farm — was clearly erroneous," Van Couyghen wrote.

Credit:  Katie Mulvaney, Journal Staff Writer | Providence Journal | Jul 30, 2018 | www.providencejournal.com ~~

PORTSMOUTH, R.I. – A Superior Court judge has struck down the Zoning Board of Review’s approval of a solar farm in a residential area of the Aquidneck Island town.

Judge Brian Van Couyghen reversed the board’s approval of a special-use permit for the 2.9-megawatt solar photovoltaic farm on 8 acres of a 29-acre plot of vacant land at 259 Jepson Lane, finding that it represented a manufacturing use that is not allowed in residential zones.

Van Couyghen cited a previous case in which the state Supreme Court found that wind turbines represented a manufacturer because they are used for the sole purpose of transforming raw materials, “namely wind – into a finished product – namely electricity.”

“Thus, even though the [zoning] board found that the proposed solar farm was similar to a public utility, it would be, in fact, a manufacturing facility because it would transform sunlight into electricity … manufacturing is expressly prohibited in residential zones under the ordinance. As a result, the granting of a special use permit for a manufacturing facility – the solar farm – was clearly erroneous,” Van Couyghen wrote.

The decision came as good news to Roger and Jane Fontaine, who challenged the Zoning Board’s June 2017 approval of the proposal by Portsmouth Solar.

“They didn’t want to have thousands of solar panels across the street from them, so they are very happy,” their lawyer, Jeremiah C. Lynch III, said Monday.

“Portsmouth is going to have to change the zoning ordinance if it wants solar farms,” Lynch said.

The ruling remains under review by the town, according to solicitor Kevin Gavin.

“We disagree with the analysis and conclusion,” Jennifer Cervenka, a lawyer for Portsmouth Solar, said. Cervenka said the company, working in conjunction with the town, is considering asking the state Supreme Court to review the ruling.

The board approved the solar farm proposal after hearings in March and May 2017. Portsmouth Solar asserted that the solar farm would be a passive use and that it would plant vegetation to shield the panels from view.

The Fontaines argued the farm would amount to “a nonregulated power producer” engaged in the business of producing and manufacturing power for sale to National Grid. The board heard dueling testimony about the impact such farms have on real-estate values.

Van Couyghen’s ruling comes as solar-farm proposals proliferate across the state, spurred by a raft of renewable-energy incentives passed by the General Assembly over the past five or six years.

A 21.5-megawatt farm in western Cranston will be the largest solar development in Rhode Island when completed later this year by Warwick-based Southern Sky Renewable Energy. North Kingstown-based Green Development is proposing up to 65 megawatts of solar capacity across several sites in Exeter and a similar amount in North Smithfield.

Other developers are planning installations in Hopkinton, Richmond, North Kingstown and Woonsocket – all of which would require varying amounts of tree clearing.

Source:  Katie Mulvaney, Journal Staff Writer | Providence Journal | Jul 30, 2018 | www.providencejournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky