LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents and PSO react to cancellation of Wind Catcher energy project 

Credit:  By Burt Mummolo | KTUL | ktul.com ~~

Lonni St. John was feeling accomplished as she pulled up the “No Wind Catcher” signs from her front yard. Once planted in protest, now removed in relief.

“When I got the news, I cried,” she said. “I cried ugly tears, I was so happy.”

A joy shared across multiple cities.

“Everybody’s just pumped, I mean just beyond belief happy,” said Maurice Storm.

He and St. John became the face of resistance in Bixby, which ultimately led PSO to change their plans for the area. And now comes the news that the entire project has been scrapped.

“It’s a great outcome for everybody except PSO,” said Storm.

“Certainly we’re disappointed that were not going to have the opportunity to save our customers $2 billion over the next 25 years,” said PSO spokesman Stan Whiteford.

While the economics of the project became an important focal point, Storm says there was more to it.

“It was just massive corporate greed disguised as green energy and consumer benefits,” he said.

The project stumbled when it came to dealing with the public.

“They treated us all really bad, you don’t treat people that way and I think it was just good against evil,” said St. John.

“It’s hard to believe that with the kind of lobbying budget that these guys have to buy influence in state governments and regulatory affairs, that they still couldn’t get it done,” Storm said. “I think that tells you a lot about the project, with all they had on the line, it still was such a bad idea that they couldn’t convince anybody to do it.”

Neither side sees it as a criticism of wind energy itself.

“I don’t think this is a statement about clean energy one way or another,” said Whiteford.

“It was not about green energy, it never was about green energy, it’s about profit,” said St. John.

PSO is turning the page and moving forward.

“We want our customers to know that we’re going to continue to look for ways to serve them as best we can,” said Whiteford.

Source:  By Burt Mummolo | KTUL | ktul.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky