[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Expert refutes wind testimony  

Credit:  By Judy Dolgos-Kramer | Times News | July 17, 2018 | www.tnonline.com ~~

A noise expert testified Monday during the hearing for the second application for commercial wind turbines in Penn Forest Township.

Robert W. Rand was called by the opposition to the project to testify about wind turbine noise.

He concluded that the noise expert for Atlantic Wind, Mark Bastasch, had improperly interpreted the ordinance and that the project would not comply with the noise restrictions set by the township ordinance.

Rand is the president at Rand Acoustics LLC, a consultant for “noise, community reaction and soundscapes.”

Rand testified he is not an engineer and that his expertise lies in all areas of commercial noise generation, not just wind turbines. After direct and cross-examination on his credentials he was accepted by the hearing board as an expert in “the field of acoustics and noise.”

The bulk of Rand’s testimony was to discredit Atlantic Wind’s noise expert’s report. In his testimony and report, Bastasch used an LEQ measurement for sound/noise, saying the noise level would meet the ordinance requirement of 45 dba at all residences.

Rand refuted this by claiming that in order to meet the standard set out in the ordinance, an L max measurement would need to be made. By applying a mathematical standard to Bastasch’s numbers, Rand concluded that the sound level would exceed the maximum allowed noise levels at every residence listed in the original report.

“It is not weighted or an averaged sound level,” Rand said. “Turbines are not a steady sound. The sound goes up and down and must be measured as a maximum to meet the ordinance.”

Rand also stated that Bastasch’s report was neither “credible nor reasonable” and that the report stated that the noise level would never be higher than the average, which “by definition some noise levels must be higher.”

When asked if he was biased against wind technology, Rand read from a prepared statement which was attached to his report.

“If someone who doesn’t know me and what I do levels the charge ‘anti-wind’ at me, they also don’t know that by the same empty logic they’d have to label me ‘anti-coal,’ ‘anti-oil,’ ‘anti-nuclear,’ ‘anti-transformer,’ ‘anti-backup-generator,’ ” Rand said.

“In my firm’s independent professional capacity, there is no particular ‘bias’ or interest in the brand of power generation being investigated or designed. My firm’s professional work, what utility and community clients have contracted for, is consultation for the best possible facility design ensuring that regulations are met, public safety, health and welfare is protected and complaints are prevented. These are professional ethics.”

The meeting on Monday night had to be moved to the township building because of renovations being made to the firehouse.

The next hearing will be held at 6 p.m. July 23 at the Penn Forest Fire Company No. 1.

Source:  By Judy Dolgos-Kramer | Times News | July 17, 2018 | www.tnonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: