[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Deepwater Wind offers offshore information, fishermen want compensation  

Credit:  By Tim Faulkner/ecoRI News staff | July 16, 2018 | www.ecori.org ~~

Deepwater Wind is trying to keep fishermen happy while it builds more offshore wind facilities. The latest effort aims to protect commercial fishing gear, but fishermen and their advocacy groups want broader protections for the fishing grounds and their livelihood.

The Providence-based company recently announced a program to inform fishermen of where and when construction and other work occurs at the site of three wind facilities and their electric cables. The offshore wind developer hired liaisons to offer dockside information to fishermen at main fishing ports such as New Bedford, Mass., Point Judith, and Montauk, N.Y. Daily activity will be posted online about surveys, construction, and maintenance work. The updates will also be broadcast twice daily on boating radio channels, according to Deepwater Wind.

Deepwater Wind has three primary offshore wind projects that will be covered by the new program: the nation’s first offshore wind facility, the Block Island Wind Farm; the Skipjack Wind Farm off the coast of Delaware and Maryland; and the South Fork Wind Farm, which is proposed for federal water between Rhode Island and Massachusetts and would deliver electricity to eastern Long Island via a 30-mile undersea cable.

Bonnie Brady, president of the Long Island Commercial Fishing Association, said the outreach by Deepwater Wind is window dressing. Deepwater Wind is “not doing anything at all. it’s a big, giant schmooze,” she said.

Brady and other commercial fishing groups are calling for a more comprehensive assessment of the impacts of these wind facilities on different fisheries, as well as a thorough plan to compensate fishermen for damaged gear and lost wages.

Brady, who represents long-line fishermen, gill netters, and trawlers at 14 ports in the Northeast, said noise from pile driving scares away fish. She noted that undersea cables permanently alter sea life and damage fishing gear.

Brady wants a compensation plan similar to the one employed by Deepwater Wind as part of the Ocean Special Area Management Plan (Ocean SAMP) that was created by Rhode Island for offshore activities such as wind farms.

“They’ve done none of that for us,” Brady said.

Groups such as the Fisheries Survival Fund and the National Coalition of Fishing Communities also want relief from the disruption of offshore wind turbines. They say the disruption of the seafloor as trenches are dug for transmission cables scares away fish. While these cables attract some sea life, they repel others, according to opponents of offshore wind. In areas that the cable can’t be buried, protective mats are used to cover the cable but easily snag fishing gear.

The Ocean SAMP mandates a review by the Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC) for the South Fork, Revolution Wind, and the Bay State Wind facilities.

But Brady said the compensation plan so far fails to consider the loss of access to fishing grounds such as Cox Ledge. She said the latest compensation system doesn’t pay for lost revenue, only damaged equipment.

Richard Fuka, president of the Rhode Island Fishermen’s Alliance, said he speaks with fishermen daily in Point Judith and he’s hearing the fishing stocks are down around the Block Island Wind Farm.

“These windmills turn on and things start to disappear,” he said.

When asked about the generally positive findings about fisheries and marine life reported by scientists at a wind energy forum at the University of Rhode Island last December, Fuka said more time is needed to assess the impacts, especially before more offshore wind facilities are approved in southern New England fishing grounds.

“We are swapping a food source for an energy source,” he said.

Source:  By Tim Faulkner/ecoRI News staff | July 16, 2018 | www.ecori.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.