[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dakota Range gets state approval for Watertown wind-farm project  

Credit:  By Bob Mercer, State Capitol Bureau | Capital Journal | www.capjournal.com ~~

PIERRE – Developers received state government’s approval Tuesday to construct the Dakota Range wind project in Grant and Codington counties.

The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission agreed to issue a construction permit.

The project would have up to 72 turbines and cost an estimated $380 million. State laws establish requirements for wind-electricity generation.

“I believe the project has met that burden,” Commissioner Chris Nelson said.

Steve Kolbeck, the South Dakota manager for Xcel Energy, and a former commission member, watched from the near the rear of the room.

Xcel gave notice June 21 the company would buy the project.

One of the permit conditions Tuesday was limiting turbine sites to moving at most 250 feet without commission approval.

Commissioner Gary Hanson suggested it. The original proposal was 325 feet.

“It means the commission gets to look at your shift,” Chairwoman Kristie Fiegen said.

Nelson opposed the change. “When you’re building stuff, you’ve got to have flexibility,” Nelson said.

Interveners made final five-minute arguments against the project.

“Codington and Grant counties will be changed forever,” Teresa Kaaz of rural South Shore told commissioners.

Kaaz said the commission kept data confidential at the developer’s request. “I live amongst the turbines. I should have the right to see the information,” she said.

The other intervener, Kristi Mogen of rural Twin Brooks, said the commission didn’t consider ice she said could be thrown from turbine blades.

“This is a 747 (jet) with an unbalanced wing,” Mogen said.

Mollie Smith, a Minneapolis lawyer representing Dakota Range, acknowledged notice wasn’t provided to James Waldron, who purchased nine acres from another landowner.

Smith said mailings were passed along to Waldron. “We do know the landowner is aware of the project,” Smith said.

Source:  By Bob Mercer, State Capitol Bureau | Capital Journal | www.capjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.