LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind Catcher proposal is before the Oklahoma Corporation Commission on Monday 

Credit:  By Jack Money | The Oklahoman | Published: Fri, June 29, 2018 | newsok.com ~~

The Oklahoma Corporation Commission will consider on Monday whether or not to allow Public Service Co. to recover costs related to its Wind Catcher Energy Connection plans.

If approved, the utility would be allowed to recover $1.36 billion in costs to buy 30 percent of the 2,000 megawatt Wind Catcher farm being built in Oklahoma’s Panhandle.

Along with co-owning the generating facility with its American Electric Power sister company, Southwestern Electric Power, the two also propose building and operating a 360-mile line that would carry electricity from the farm into the grids they operate that distribute power to their customers.

Utility regulators in Arkansas and Louisiana have approved Southwestern’s plans for the project, while Texas regulators are considering it. The project’s total cost for both utilities is $4.5 billion.

An administrative law judge who considered PSO’s proposal recommends the commission deny the utility’s request to be granted preapproval to recover its costs.

The judge recommends denial because the utility did not seek competitive construction bids for the farm and because that work had started before PSO filed its request.

While PSO estimates its 545,000 customers would see a rate increase of about $78 million in 2021, it also maintains that lower energy costs and connected federal wind production tax credits would offset that increase.

The company also states it believes its ratepayers will benefit during the project’s life because of affordability forecasts for wind energy.

And the utility’s pending agreement proposes additional safeguards it believes would save customers money throughout the project’s expected life.

It proposes capping costs to ratepayers for the project at 103 percent, guarantees the project would qualify for 100 percent of federal renewable energy production tax credits available when the farm’s construction started in 2016, guarantees average net power generation and proposes requiring PSO to review the project’s benefits to ratepayers after 10 years.

The Oklahoma Attorney General and the commission’s Public Utility Division continue to oppose PSO’s proposal.

Support, opposition

Numerous parties support PSO’s settlement proposal.

However, new opposition being mounted by the city of Bixby and by residents who potentially could be impacted by the eastern end of the proposed power line recently surfaced.

An attorney representing both told commissioners Thursday his clients are concerned both about the process the utility uses to locate and build lines and about this line’s potential health impacts.

Commissioners debated but didn’t decide whether to allow those parties to become involved, discussing whether the commission has authority to be involved in a power line siting process and whether or not these new parties might seek to have the entire case be reconsidered.

In response to questions asked by Commissioner Bob Anthony, an attorney representing the agency’s Public Utility Division told commissioners the agency does not have authority to oversee the siting process a utility uses to build a line.

State law grants utilities the authority to seek the land they need for such projects through district courts using eminent domain.

The attorney also told commissioners there are no existing standards that have been put forward either by the federal government or Oklahoma that can be used to evaluate potential adverse health impacts from high-voltage power lines.

Commission Chairman Dana Murphy, however, said she felt the commission can consider line siting plans in the context of how those plans impact project costs. And Commissioner Todd Hiett said he wouldn’t object to allowing new parties into the case, provided they won’t seek a reconsideration of the case in its entirety.

The commission will consider PSO’s proposal and whether or not to grant standing to the new parties at a 1:30 p.m. meeting.

Source:  By Jack Money | The Oklahoman | Published: Fri, June 29, 2018 | newsok.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon