[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Zoning director recommends additional testing in wind complaint  

Credit:  By Ben Muir, Editor | Huron County View | 2018-06-28 | huroncountyview.mihomepaper.com ~~

HURON COUNTY – A Port Hope man who filed a complaint against a wind farm in 2016 is making headway with county officials after a board of commissioners meeting on Tuesday.

At the meeting, about nine people came to the defense of Robert Gaffke, saying his nearly two-year-old ongoing complaint against Big Turtle Wind Farm ought to be resolved by the board of commissioners.

Gaffke argues in a complaint that wind turbines near his home are too loud. As required in the 2010 county complaint resolution process, Heritage Sustainable Energy LLC, which owns the wind farm, hired Epsilon Associates Inc. to conduct sound-level testing on Gaffke’s property. However, Gaffke refused to allow Epsilon on his property, citing what he believed as erroneous testing methods it had used in other complaints.

As a result, Epsilon eventually tested at a property nearly three-quarters of a mile from Gaffke’s residence in May 2017. Epsilon’s report said sound levels were in compliance, but the testing did not meet all the criteria of standards and protocols that are required, according to Jeff Smith, the county building and zoning director. Despite that, the protocols used in the test by Epsilon were approved by the Huron County Planning Commission, Smith said.

“Huron County Corporation Counsel had stated during a planning commission meeting that the county should accept the results of the Epsilon report at face value,” Smith added in an email to the VIEW.

At the meeting on Tuesday, Commissioner John A. Nugent addressed the people who voiced their defense of Gaffke.

“Since you all seem to be on the same page with this … I’ll treat it as one person,” Nugent said, “If the board were to agree to have a third party review the data that Epsilon has already provided, would you be satisfied with that even if it ruled against you?”

Gaffke, saying he speaks for the group, said hiring an entity to review the data that was taken from a location near his property would show due diligence and would “go a long way with this group of people.”

At this, Smith said Epsilon has provided valid testing in other locations and has testing results based on modeling before the turbines were built, but he doubted the validity of the testing conducted closest to Gaffke’s residence.

“The location that they used to prove compliance at Mr. Gaffke’s would not, to me, cut the mustard,” said Smith, referring to the location of where the testing equipment was set up. “I don’t doubt the report in totality, but I don’t believe the location they used to show compliance at Mr. Gaffke’s can show compliance.”

So, reviewing that data from that location, like Nugent suggested, is a concern if the test is invalid to begin with, Smith said.

“The only way to make it conclusive for a complaint is to test at his location,” Smith said. “So I think Mr. Nugent, maybe the board, should consider having someone come and test at Mr. Gaffke’s location. Obviously he’s not going to trust what I do there from his comments he has publicly stated at meetings.”

The goal of hiring an independent third party to test at Gaffke’s location is to gather sound levels and then compare them to the results that Epsilon has provided, Smith said.

After the meeting, Gaffke told the Huron County VIEW he would allow a third-party entity hired by the county on to his property, if the proper protocols and standards are followed.

Source:  By Ben Muir, Editor | Huron County View | 2018-06-28 | huroncountyview.mihomepaper.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.