[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Humboldt County wind turbine proposal changes again  

Credit:  Robert Wolf | The Messenger | Jun 9, 2018 | www.messengernews.net ~~

DAKOTA CITY – The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors decided to again revise a proposed ordinance governing wind towers at Monday’s meeting.

The board considered approving the first reading of the proposed ordinance Monday which included changes that involve the supervisors more in the application process.

Also, the building permit fee has doubled from $500 to $1,000 per tower. However, additional changes in wording were added.

Humboldt County Economic Development Director Alissa O’Connor suggested the board revise the ordinance’s definition of a “neighboring dwelling unit.” The board agreed, revising the definition to a livable dwelling, and an unoccupied dwelling unit is a dwelling that has been unoccupied for two calendar years or more.

Also, the decommissioning plan which was to be submitted to the farm owners was changed to be submitted to the landowners.

Because of those two changes added Monday the board must go back to the drawing board again and have the first reading again next Monday, Auditor Peggy Rice said.

“If you want any more changes you better do it today,” Supervisor Carl Mattes said.

There were no changes in the setback requirements which remain: 150 feet from property lines; 1,000 feet from neighboring dwelling units; and 600 feet from wildlife management areas, state recreational areas, confinement feeding operation buildings, wetlands, U.S. Fish and Wildlife properties; and one half the rotor diameter from other structures, cemeteries, and river bluffs.

Some landowners have asked the board to increase the setback distances. However, that might disqualify some of the smaller farming operations from accepting the wind towers.

There was no change in the noise limit of 60 decibels at the nearest structure or use occupied by humans. Some landowners felt the noise limit was too high.

The majority of the board felt the setback distances and noise limit were in line with what had been approved in several other counties.

Landowner Thomas Wilson asked the board to at least read the studies on adverse health effects from the wind towers which he brought. He was afraid his small farm might end up being surrounded by the towers. Even the wind farm companies recommend setback distances greater than in the ordinance, he said.

“I’ve said this many times. I think we’ve gained a little. I don’t think we’ve gained enough with what we came up with on this ordinance,” Supervisor Erik Underberg said. “A lot of it has to do with the setbacks and distances, maybe a couple of other things.”

Written in the ordinance is a clause whereby the distances can be waived if both parties are agreeable.

“The smaller landowners have the ability to waive those distances,” Underberg said.

The board approved the changes with Underberg casting the sole vote against them. Written as such, the ordinance offers very little protection to the neighboring landowners, he said.

“It does not, as I said before, set the bar very high” as far as distances and the noise level, he said. He would like to see minimum of 600 feet distance from property lines. His recommendations were not added.

Source:  Robert Wolf | The Messenger | Jun 9, 2018 | www.messengernews.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.