[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windmills generate conversation: Supervisors hear from public regarding wind turbine proposal 

Credit:  Charlotte Underwood | Winterset Madisonian | May 2, 2018 | www.wintersetmadisonian.com ~~

Wind turbines generated comments from the public once again at the Madison County Supervisor’s meeting. County officials heard from multiple people wishing to express their opinion on the proposed Arbor Hill wind turbine project, which calls for as many as 52 wind turbines for northwest Madison County – all slightly taller and larger in diameter than the Macksburg Wind Farm project of 2014.

MidAmerican Energy had gone before the board of adjustment seeking variances for the larger turbines on April 3, but after hearing from both those in favor and against, the issue was tabled for 90 days by the three-member board.

Since that early April meeting, the county has been churning with conversation regarding the wind turbine proposal. County supervisors have had a packed meeting room twice, with citizens wishing to go on record with comments both for and against the Arbor Hill project.

During Tuesday’s meeting, officials heard from Brett Terhaar, who spoke on behalf of Coalition for Scenic Preservation. He told supervisors that while he “firmly believed land owners had every right to do what they wanted within reason, and that he was not for far-reaching government interference” he was asking that officials “look at the whole project … especially the proposed variances and setbacks.”

Terhaar spoke of “safety concerns” regarding the 500-foot setbacks on property lines and 1,000-foot setbacks from residences. He recommended setbacks be more in line with those of “other states”. He also discussed a study that determined property values could drop on properties within a two-mile radius of the turbines. Health impact, sound annoyance on humans, and the impact of turbines on bats and birds was also briefly touched on.

A fifth-generation farmer from Penn Township spoke to supervisors in support of the wind turbines, as did several others, saying that “America needed green energy” and “farmers needed a way to diversify.”

Glenna Finney, from Jackson Township, spoke in favor of wind farms, telling supervisors the county “shouldn’t pass up the opportunity to have green energy.” She also said she had “lived here her whole life and had never seen people act like this – neighbors against neighbors.” After speaking, Finney presented supervisors with a petition of signatures in support of the Arbor Hills wind project.

Judy Neal, who lives on a farm in the Pitzer area, spoke in support of the project, too. “As farmers, we need to consider other options … I would like you to consider letting us have wind farms. I’m looking ahead to my grandchildren – we’d like to have something to pass on to them,” Neal said.

An audience member addressed the board, encouraging supervisors to have an updated comprehensive plan in place before the Arbor Hill project is approved.

“We know the county needs wind energy, but I would like the county to take its time in making sure you fully review what is proposed; make a comprehensive plan that will take all land owners into account.”

The county just began the process of updating its comprehensive plan, which could take a year or more to complete.

Look for the issue to come back before the board of adjustment in early July if it gets untabled.

Source:  Charlotte Underwood | Winterset Madisonian | May 2, 2018 | www.wintersetmadisonian.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon