[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wheatridge wind farm seeks bigger turbine blades  

Credit:  By Phil Wright, Staff Writer | Hermiston Herald | Published on May 1, 2018 | www.hermistonherald.com ~~

NextEra Energy Resources wants taller blades on turbines at its Wheatridge Wind Energy Facility sites in Umatilla and Morrow counties.

NextEra, based in Florida, bought the development rights for the 292-turbine wind farm in June 2017. The project would produce a maximum of 500 megawatts of power on almost 13,100 acres separated into two sites – the west turbine group about 7 miles northwest of Heppner and the east turbine group which spans the border of Morrow and Umatilla counties.

NextEra in early April told the Oregon Department of Energy it wants to use larger blades on its turbines. Company spokesperson Steve Stengel said the blades would boost the height of the turbines from 476 feet to a maximum of 500 feet. The larger blades increase the ability to capture the wind, he said, and thus mean greater efficiency.

The company also wants to build a 20 megawatt battery storage site at Wheatridge East and a 30 megawatt battery storage site at Wheatridge West. Stengel said the storage units would fit into the project’s existing footprint. NextEra in the April 6 letter stated the structures would have a neutral-colored finish to blend into the surroundings.

Overall, NextEra asserted in the letter, the changes are not significant, and thus asked the energy department to conduct a “Type B review” of recommended changes to the site certificate. That review process is faster and does not include a public hearing.

The energy department replied April 25 and stated it “considers the proposed modifications to be complex” and thus warrant the longer, more stringent Type A review that includes a public hearing.

The battery storage systems are new components, the reply continued, which the department’s Energy Facility Siting Council has not evaluated. The state also noted NextEra did not provide information about potential adverse effects from the storage systems, “particularly related to impacts and fire safety risk.”

The ball now is in NextEra’s court. Stengel said the company will continue to work with the department of energy and provide the information it requests.

Construction of Wheatridge has yet to begin. NextEra has until May 2020 to break ground and then three years to finish. Stengel said the longer review process means a greater cost to the company but should not push back construction.

Umatilla County in 2015 opposed the wind farm because Wheatridge Wind Energy’s preliminary application to the Oregon Department of Energy and the Energy Facility Siting Council did not address where it would install transmission lines. The county paid $22,608 to Kellington Law Group of Lake Oswego to review the case and defend the county’s position of including the installation.

County counsel Doug Olsen and the county’s former planning director, Tamra Mabbott, now with the city of Umatilla, suggested the county seek the outside advice. Olsen said the money covered about a week’s worth of work from the law firm, but once the siting council decided Wheatridge did not have to include powerline placement in the plan, the county’s fight was finished. Commissioner George Murdock agreed. After that, he said, there was no use pursuing the matter.

Much of the discussion concerning Wheatridge and those powerlines took place in public meetings and public hearings. But deciding to drop the matter did not.

Mabbott at that time told the commissioners the county would seek reimbursement for the lawyer fees from the Oregon Department of Energy. Instead, Wheatridge will pay that tab.

Under the strategic investment plan the county and Wheatridge worked out in September 2017, the company will pay property taxes on the first $25 million in real market value of the project, a community service fee up to $500,000 a year for 15 years, and local improvement payments of $150,000 a year for 15 years. Wheatridge also has to cut a $22,607 check to cover the county’s lawyer fees.

Olsen said none of that money comes in, however, until after the wind farm is operational.

Source:  By Phil Wright, Staff Writer | Hermiston Herald | Published on May 1, 2018 | www.hermistonherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.