[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Not in my backyard 

Credit:  The Advertiser-Tribune | Apr 18, 2018 | www.advertiser-tribune.com ~~

I have a question. Regarding the April 13 A-T article titled “Officials Back Wind Turbine Bill,” the officials noted in the article who are on record of supporting the proposed Republic and Seneca Wind farm projects included State Rep. Bill Reineke, County Commissioner Holly Stacy, County Commissioner Mike Kerschner, County Commissioner Shayne Thomas and SIEDC President David Zak.

My question is, How close is the nearest proposed wind turbine site to the homes of each of these public officials?

I can tell you that if the changes as proposed with SB 238 are passed, I will have a turbine located just more than 400 yards from my house. I do not support the proposed changes to the existing “setback” rule that basically changes the minimum distance from a turbine to the nearest adjacent property line to the nearest inhabited residence. This proposed change to the law has a major effect on how many turbines can be constructed in a given area and their physical location relative to other land owner’s property.

It is easy for a public official to support projects that negatively affect others but not themselves directly. It would really be interesting to see how many of these same public officials would support the project if they were going to have a wind turbine 400 yards from their house. I already know the answer.

I am not necessarily opposed to the wind farm projects in general even though it is a well-known fact that wind is not economically competitive without subsidies, but all I ask is that we respect the current law and the rights of adjacent property owners. I urge the public to contact their elected officials in opposition of SB 238.


Greg Smith,


Source:  The Advertiser-Tribune | Apr 18, 2018 | www.advertiser-tribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky