LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy bill headed to Senate 

Credit:  Heather Mullinix | Crossville Chronicle | April 10, 2018 | www.crossville-chronicle.com ~~

A bill to regulate industrial wind energy farms in Tennessee has passed the state House and has advanced to the state Senate for consideration.

“I think this is a very good piece of legislation that is making sure that all property owners have a voice in the process,” said state Rep. Cameron Sexton, who sponsored the bill in the House. “It’s a very reasonable approach that takes into account personal property rights as well as the rights of adjacent property owners.”

The bill passed the House 63-23 on Thursday. It was scheduled to be heard in the Senate Wednesday. Sen. Paul Bailey sponsored the Senate bill.

“It’s been a two-year process,” Sexton said of the legislation. “Sen. Bailey and I appreciate all the input we received from our local constituents and various departments.”

Members of the Cumberland Mountain Preservation Coalition [CMPC] made multiple trips to Nashville to speak with lawmakers on the proposed bill and offer suggestions.

The bill regulates industrial wind energy facilities with turbines greater than 200 feet in height. Developers would be required to obtain a certificate of public convenience and to obtain a permit from the local legislative body.

Permits would require a two-thirds majority of the local legislative body. Municipal governments would only be able to approve permits if the county had adopted permitting requirements.

The bill requires the following minimum standards:

  • Minimum setback of five times the height of the turbine from the property line, unless adjoining property owners waive that provision
  • Completion of an environmental impact assessment to include economic impacts, impacts on ecosystems, viewshed analysis, hydrogeological assessment, risk assessment and mitigation recommendations for shadow flicker and interference with air traffic
  • Completion of a wildlife impact assessment
  • Noise limits
  • Financial security of 100 percent of the estimated cost to decommission the wind energy facility
  • Mandatory decommissioning if a facility ceased to generate electricity for 180 continuous days or if any turbine or group of turbines violates the noise limits
  • Requirements to return property to its original condition within 12 months of decommissioning

The bill does not affect any wind energy facilities operating or constructed prior to the bill becoming law, nor does it affect local regulations adopted prior to Jan. 1, 2019.

Last year Sexton sought a 15-month moratorium on industrial wind farm projects in Tennessee to allow time for a special committee to study possible regulations for wind energy construction projects.

“Forty-six states have passed some form of state-local control of wind energy projects,” Sexton said.

The study committee looked at regulations implemented in several other states to develop minimum standards. Local governments may strengthen those rules, but not weaken them, Sexton said.

The move for regulations came after a proposed wind energy project atop Millstone Mountain near Crab Orchard came under fire from local residents, who cited concerns about noise, flicker, negative effects on property values and local tourism, possible health effects and negative environmental impacts.

The proposed $100 million project under development by Apex Clean Energy, of Charlottesville, VA, was suspended last summer.

“Based on current market conditions and the project’s fundamental qualities, we have decided not to make this significant investment at this time,” Harry Snyder, development manager, wrote. “Our work on the Crab Orchard Wind project will be therefore suspended until market conditions change to make the project more competitive.”

The company had proposed 20 to 23 wind turbines for the project, with estimated energy production of 71 megawatts of power.

Source:  Heather Mullinix | Crossville Chronicle | April 10, 2018 | www.crossville-chronicle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon