[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Appeals court affirms tearing down turbines; Court case prompts addition of new wind turbine ordinance  

Credit:  By Anelia K. Dimitrova | Oelwein Daily Register | Feb 23, 2018 | www.communitynewspapergroup.com ~~

A zoning administrator acted illegally when she granted applications to a company to build turbines on agricultural land north and east of Fairbank.

That’s what the Iowa Court of Appeals said in a Feb. 21 ruling.

The Fayette County zoning administrator and the county attorney on whose legal advice she acted, erred when issuing a permit to the company that built turbines, the court concluded.

Optimum, the turbine company, was granted easements by Thomas and Kimberly Rourke to build the three turbines.

The board of adjustment denied the company’s application for a special use permit, but the company countered they didn’t need a permit because they were nothing more than an electrical transmitting facility, which are authorized under the zoning rules.

The Decorah-based attorney who represented the county, James Burns, of Miller, Pearson, Gloe, Burns & Parrish, agreed with Optimum, greenlighting the project.

The City of Fairbank, represented by David Hosack, of Roberts, Stevens and Prendergast of Waterloo, along with several residents, Ron Woods, John Woods, and James Costello, as well as their businesses, C&W Farms and Woods Construction, who were represented by Pat Dillon, of Dillon Law, of Sumner, argued that the construction of the turbines would diminish the value of the neighboring land and would interfere with their use and enjoyment of their own properties.

Optimum was represented by Alexander Johnson of Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville and Schoenebaum of Des Moines.

The Iowa Environmental Council, which did not take part in the litigation, submitted an opinion siding with the turbine company.

In district court, Judge John Bauercamper determined the approval of the applications illegal, and directed the zoning administrator and the board of adjustment to comply with the law and remove the illegally erected structures.

Optimum and the board appealed, arguing the judge erred because he didn’t review if the board’s decision was supported by additional evidence and improperly considered other evidence.

At the court of appeals, Judge Anuradha Vaitheswaran authored the court’s opinion, which was also signed by her colleagues, Judge David Danilson and Thomas Bower.

The court said that the company failed to prove that wind turbines fit under the definition of electrical transmission facilities.

Reflecting on the appeals court’s decision, Attorney Pat Dillon said counties should be crafting their own ordinances regarding wind turbines.

“Iowa counties should be proactive in developing ordinances for wind turbines in order to avoid such issues,” Dillon told the Oelwein Daily Register. “Part of the problem is that we are using a 1970s ordinance to deal with 2015 applications.”

The ordinance in Fayette County has since been changed.

“We’ve tried to change our ordinance in 2010 with our Council of Governments and they had a big turnover and we never got it done,” Miller, the Fayette County zoning administrator, said. “We have a farm at Hawkeye with 15 turbines that was built in 2012. We’ve processed these towers (in Fairbank) like we have any tower as a conditional use, including telecommunication towers. We’ve had numerous public hearings about these towers to be constructed at a few different locations, and we felt we were in full compliance with the law.”

Since the case went to court, and as a result of it, on July 18, 2016, the Fayette County Board of Supervisors approved a separate ordinance regulating the placement of commercial wind energy conversion systems.

Lawyers for Optimum did not return calls to the newspaper seeking comment.

Source:  By Anelia K. Dimitrova | Oelwein Daily Register | Feb 23, 2018 | www.communitynewspapergroup.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.