LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Swanton Wind seeks refund; Developers ask supreme court for return of $100k 

Credit:  By Tom Benton, Staff Writer | St. Albans Messenger | February 8, 2018 | www.samessenger.com ~~

SWANTON – Swanton Wind is filing an appeal with the Vermont Supreme Court, looking to overturn the Public Utility Commission (PUC)’s determination that the project’s application was incomplete, and that the project should not be refunded its $100,000 filing fee.

Leslie A. Cadwell, the project’s attorney before the PUC, filed the notice of appeal Tuesday.

The PUC determined the project’s application for a Certificate of Public Good – basically, a preliminary construction permit – was incomplete in June 2017. Swanton Wind filed a motion requesting that the commission reconsider, but the board issued another decision at the end of August, saying its incompleteness determination stood.

The commission determined that Swanton Wind’s application required a system impact study, investigating the effect the project’s interconnection might have on utilities, customers and the overall grid. The PUC said the area with which the project would interconnect is known for excess power, and therefore required a system impact study.

Swanton Wind responded by noting that the PUC has previously approved several projects without requiring a preliminary system impact study. But the PUC said those projects had sufficient information from qualified experts in other areas of its application, whereas Swanton Wind, the commission said, did not.

The commission also stated that completing a preliminary system impact study would not cost the project’s developers more in time or resources than if the project conducted the study after PUC approval, as projects usually do.

Project representatives announced that Swanton Wind was putting its application on hold in late November, due to what project representatives said was an “unpredictable” permitting process and the possibility of federal tax changes.

The project had been in development, and the subject of endless controversy, for more than two years then.

While the PUC granted the dismissal of Swanton Wind’s application, the commission did not approve developers’ request for a return of the $100,000 filing fee they paid upon filing the application with the PUC in Sept.2016. That fee, per Vermont statutes, is directly paid to the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.

As such, commissioners wrote, the PUC has no statutory authority to refund that fee.Though the PUC received notice of Swanton Wind’s appeal Tuesday, the Vermont Supreme Court had not received notice of the appeal, let alone the appeal itself, as of that afternoon.

Swanton Wind was developed by Travis and Ashley Belisle. The project would have included up to seven turbines generating up to 20 megawatts of paper, sited on Rocky Ridge, near the border of Swanton and St. Albans Town and behind the Belisles’ home.

Source:  By Tom Benton, Staff Writer | St. Albans Messenger | February 8, 2018 | www.samessenger.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon