[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Minister overrules inspector and council to allow onshore beauty spot windfarm  

Credit:  By Gareth Hughes | Daily Post | 9 Feb 2018 | www.dailypost.co.uk ~~

Controversial plans for another windfarm on Denbigh Moors have been given the go-ahead by the Welsh Government.

The decision by Lesley Griffiths, the Secretary for energy, planning and rural affairs, is at odds with the recommendation of planning inspector Kay Sheffield who had upheld Denbighshire County Council’s refusal to allow the development.

Pant y Maen Windfarm Limited want to erect seven turbines near Llyn Bran, alongside the A543 road over the moors.

One of the council’s main objections was the impact on the landscape, especially from the Clwydian Range and Dee Valley area of outstanding natural beauty, 19 miles away on the opposite side of the Vale of Clwyd.

Ms Sheffield agreed with the authority that the turbines, 518 metres above sea level, would be clearly visible against the backdrop of the Snowdon Horseshoe, spoiling the view for walkers along the Offa’s Dyke footpath.

The company argued that the impact would be only “medium” and that the main elements of the view would not be affected.

Among other objectors were CADW, the body responsible for ancient monuments, who expressed concern about the effect on the view from and of nearby Bronze Age barrows, or burial mounds.

In 2008 a lengthy legal battle over plans for a larger windfarm on a nearby site at Llyn Brenig ended with the Court of Appeal finally upholding the council’s rejection of the scheme – and that was a major consideration with the present proposal.

Dismissing the latest appeal, Ms Sheffield said: “I have concluded that the development would cause harm to the landscape and visual amenity and in reaching this conclusion I have weighed in the balance the implicit objective to accept significant change to the landscape character of the Strategic Search Area (SSA).”

She said the windfarm would also have an “unacceptable overbearing impact on the outlook from the Sportsman’s Arms”.

She concluded: “On balance I consider that the positive benefits of renewable energy and the location of the site within the SSA are not sufficient to outweigh the harm in respect of the landscape and visual amenity and harm to the historic environment.”

But Mrs Griffiths said the location had been accepted in principle by the county council subject to consideration of the localised effects.

“I consider the benefits of the proposal in terms of delivering renewable energy on a site located within an SSA are material considerations which are sufficient to outweigh the identified impacts of the scheme and the balance, therefore, weighs in favour of the appeal,” she said.

Source:  By Gareth Hughes | Daily Post | 9 Feb 2018 | www.dailypost.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter