LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Neb. lawmaker says Sandhills wind farm ban still on the table 

Credit:  Karen Uhlenhuth | February 5, 2018 | energynews.us ~~

The author of a Nebraska bill to broaden public comment on wind farm permits in the state says he’s prepared to bring a harsher measure if it doesn’t pass.

State Sen. Tom Brewer, a Republican who represents the scenic Sandhills region in northwestern Nebraska, said he’s willing to reintroduce a bill from last year that would have imposed a two-year moratorium on wind development in the region.

The lawmaker characterized this year’s bill as an attempt to “make sure we know what’s going on as we move forward,” but if it gets held up, he said it “probably will inspire bringing SB504 out of committee.”

SB504 was introduced late in the 2017 session and didn’t move beyond the committee. In addition to barring wind development in the Sandhills, it called for establishing a task force to recommend longer-term policy for the region.

“We think this is a more reasonable position. It isn’t stopping wind altogether,” Brewer said of his current bill, which was heard in committee on Thursday.

This year’s bill, LB1054, would broaden the range of public comment allowed on wind farm proposals before the state’s Power Review Board. Currently, the board only hears comments pertaining to three distinct issues, which are largely the province of utility staff, according to the board’s executive director, Tim Texel.

Brewer’s proposal would open proceedings to concerns about aesthetics, noise, health concerns, property values and wildlife habitat. That could vastly expand the scope of the state approval process. The bill is now before the Senate Natural Resources Committee.

Source:  Karen Uhlenhuth | February 5, 2018 | energynews.us

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky