LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Area First Nations weigh in on turbine project 

Credit:  By Vicki Gough, Special to Postmedia Network | Wednesday, January 17, 2018 | www.thechronicle-online.com ~~

Dutton Dunwich council is getting support from neighbouring First Nation communities in the municipality’s bid to block the proposed Strong Breeze Wind Project.

Municipal council’s meeting agenda on Jan. 11 included correspondence from the chiefs of Oneida Nation of the Thames, Chippewas of The Thames First Nation and Munsee Delaware Nation.

Deputy Mayor Bob Purcell said he had met with the band chiefs in December to initiate dialogue on areas of mutual interest and concern.

“… the Oneida Nation of the Thames elected Chief and Council have agreed to support your opposition to the Strong Breeze Wind Turbine project,” elected Chief Randall Phillips stated in a letter.

“The Oneida Nation of the Thames will also join your efforts to have this project halted completely,” the chief added.

Phillips said his council will ask the Minister of Environment and Climate Change to “immediately halt all approvals” related to the wind farm and “request to be properly engaged in the consultation process.”

Chief Myeengun Henry stated in an email to Purcell that the wind project “has not been brought to the attention of Chippewas of The Thames First Nation as is necessary.”

Chief Roger Thomas told Purcell in an email: “There has been not any real conciliation between the Munsee Delaware Nation and Strong Breeze Industrial Wind Turbine and yes they were advised of a land claim that is still in effect.”

Purcell said the chiefs demonstrated interest in coming to a municipal council meeting to continue talks between the parties.

The deputy mayor said council would also be welcome to participate in band council meetings “to get to know each other, as neighbours and forge a lasting, working relationship.”

Coun. Dan McKillop, who announced last fall he would no longer declare a conflict of interest during wind turbine discussions, questioned why council wasn’t made aware of the meeting with area chiefs.

“We didn’t know about this until letters showed up in our agenda,” McKillop said.

He added it was “embarrassing as a councillor” to receive a call from someone connected to one of the reserves asking him what he knew about the meeting when he “had no clue” there had been any discussion.

“It’s a sensitive subject and it’s one of these ones that happen in our community,” McKillop said he told the caller.

“So going forward we need to have more transparency if we’re going to do it, I’m not going to stop it. It’s just to say ‘Hey, I’m reaching out to the First Nations’ so we know and I think it’s a great idea.”

Purcell said area First Nations are also interested in exploring “economic opportunities in harmony with ourselves.

“We have started a true reconciliation process with our neighbours, which is long overdue, but you’ve got to start somewhere and we were very well received by all three nations and chiefs.”

Purcell said all three chiefs expressed opposition to the installation and the process used in the wind turbine project.

In a recorded vote, council unanimously passed a resolution to direct staff to formally thank each chief for their written support and accommodate their desire to work with Dutton Dunwich council on mutually important issues.

Source:  By Vicki Gough, Special to Postmedia Network | Wednesday, January 17, 2018 | www.thechronicle-online.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky