[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

No benefit to wind plan 

Credit:  People's column | Observer | Dec 31, 2017 | www.observertoday.com ~~

The Cassadaga Wind Project is a complete waste. The project nameplate of 126 MW is incorrect and seriously misleading. New York state wind capacity factors – efficiencies – are only 26 percent. So 126MW is in reality only 32.8MW. Laying waste to 40,000 acres – or 62.5 square miles – to produce a measly insignificant 32.8MW is without merit.

Nearby the Dunkirk Power Plant is 530MW with coal and 435MW using inexpensive reliable plentiful natural gas. Dunkirk Power Plant footprint is tiny compared to 62.5 square miles.

EverPower is number six on list of 12 corporations receiving subsidies.

“Subsidies and Loan Guarantees Received by Members of the Alliance for Clean Energy New York” lists tax dollar subsidies to 12 corporations including EverPower.

Arkwright, Charlotte and Cherry Creek are not listed as receiving a subsidy should they decide to intervene.

From the chart available at “ACENY–Member–Subsidy–Totals” EverPower received:

¯ Federal subsidies – grants and tax credits – by EverPower – $317,010,070

¯ State subsidies by EverPower – $11,033,315

¯ Grand total by Everpower – $328,043,385

It should be noted that $5.509 billion – not million – of your tax dollars were subsidies to foreign corporations

Federal and state ratepayer and taxpayer subsidies to these 12 corporations is unacceptable for the land they destroy and the measly expensive unreliable unneeded power they produce.



Sheridan sign issue is minor


I read the recent letter from a writer on how he noticed something was not there in Sheridan. It was a little wooden sign that was removed.

I could not help but compare the same thing about arkwright Hills. Something is missing there as acres of forest have been cut down. Animals have been driven from their habitat while people’s homes and properties have become devalued.

Our highways are a wreck and residents will have to live with this the rest of their lives.

We own property off Straight Road and I believe some of our neighbors have allowed developers to log it, put up windmills and destroy the natural beauty of Arkwright. Why would some be concerned with one sign while the natural beauty of our area is threatened by these turbines?

I guess it’s easier to preach about someone else’s back yard than your own.



Source:  People's column | Observer | Dec 31, 2017 | www.observertoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon