Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Turbine health fears ‘warrant study’
Credit: Graham Lloyd, Environment Editor | The Australian | www.theaustralian.com.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
There is a plausible basis for thinking noise from wind turbines may lead to adverse health outcomes, such as to warrant further investigation, Victoria’s Administrative Appeals Tribunal has found.
An appeals judgment on the charitable trust status of the industrial noise lobby group Waubra Foundation said it was not necessary for the AAT to draw conclusions as to the precise nature of the annoyance or how it arose.
It accepted that “conducting, supporting and advocating for further research or engaging in awareness-raising activities could be properly characterised as activities promoting the prevention or control of diseases”.
However, the AAT said it did not follow that the Waubra Foundation’s other activities, in particular its responses to requests for information, its support and assistance to those complaining of the perceived effects of wind farm sound, and its participation in litigation were also to be regarded as the promotion for the prevention or control of diseases.
As a result, the AAT upheld an earlier judgment which effectively stripped the Waubra Foundation of its tax deductible status.
Waubra Foundation chief executive Sarah Laurie said the group was considering its options.
The AAT heard evidence about the state of scientific knowledge on the possible health impacts of turbines. It did not attempt to solve the issue or rule on whether annoyance may be caused by sound which is not audible (infrasound).
“That is something which we expect will be the subject of further study,” the AAT said. “For our purposes, it is sufficient that annoyance is produced, and it appears that it may be associated with adverse health outcomes.
“An identification of the causes of that annoyance may allow it to be reduced or mitigated and adverse health outcomes to be reduced or avoided.”
The AAT said it regarded as significant that the National Health and Medical Research Council had provided $3.3 million to investigate the issue.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: