[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Controversial Caithness windfarm plans to be heard at public inquiry  

Credit:  Windfarm plan under the spotlight; E.ON’s Lybster proposal provoked 260 public objections | By Jamie McKenzie | The Press and Journal | 4 November 2017, updated 5 November 2017 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Plans for a Caithness windfarm which received 260 objections will be decided by Scottish Government ministers after a local public inquiry.

Power giant E-on’s proposed Golticlay development, just north of Lybster, would have 19 turbines standing up to 426ft high.

Councillors formally objected to the plans in September, highlighting concerns about the negative impact on local osprey and rare wildcat populations, resulting in an inquiry.

A spokeswoman for E-on said the company is “disappointed” by the north planning committee’s view as they believe the site is a “suitable location for a windfarm.”

But Independent Caithness councillor Matthew Reiss, a former wildlife crime officer, said: “No one can accuse them (objectors) of being ‘nimbies’ because, frankly, nearly everyone has turbines.

“I think there has to be balance struck. Most reasonable people accept wind power has its place but, we are clearly wanting to attract people to come and live in the far north. As councillors, we are required to assess each windfarm on individual merits, but somewhere there is a tipping point.

“If we damage the natural environment we will eventually get to the point where our reputation starts to suffer. We have to be careful.”

Mr Reiss says he has asked Scottish Wildcat Action – a meber of Scottish Natural Heritage – to fund a wildcat survey at the site but was told Caithness is not a priority area.

He said the latest survey from last summer recorded no wildcats, but stressed this was done just after a loud digger was reported on the site, potentially scaring them off.

Mr Reiss said he was also told by a source they had spotted a wildcat there as recently as Tuesday night.

Studies by E-on have found osprey nests at the site and recorded their flight paths in the area – but the developers say they would relocate the rare birds to artificial nests.

Caithness-based Objector Stuart Young said the Scottish Government do not value community objections unless they specifically raise materials planning issues, referring to details of a government examination report of the council’s Highland-wide development plan.

He added: “The Scottish Government since it took power has systematically removed the rights of the people.”

But a Scottish Government spokesman said: “All material issues, including public representations, are carefully considered before the determination of any Section 36 wind farm application.

“Relevant material considerations, including those made by members of the public, will be considered by the inquiry.”

Source:  Windfarm plan under the spotlight; E.ON’s Lybster proposal provoked 260 public objections | By Jamie McKenzie | The Press and Journal | 4 November 2017, updated 5 November 2017 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.