LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Another well goes bad; still no halt to wind farm 

Credit:  Retired hydrogeologist puzzled at lack of action | By Ellwood Shreve, Chatham Daily News | Thursday, October 26, 2017 | www.chathamdailynews.ca ~~

Water Wells First member Dave Lusk has been seeing water wells go bad all around him, so he knew it was only a matter of time before he’d meet the same fate.

The Green Valley Line resident is the 14th property owner in the North Kent Wind Farm project construction area to report that his well system has been impacted after pile driving began nearby for the construction an industrial wind turbine.

“It was just a matter of time before most of us are going to get it,” Lusk said, adding his well system was initially “clogged right off.”

He said there is now just a “trickle” that comes through the tap.

Like other well owners who have experienced the same problem, Lusk has a large tank at his home, supplied by North Kent Wind to provide water.

Lusk said he is “pissed” that the well on the family’s fourth-generation farm is likely ruined.

He said when his family first acquired the farm, they didn’t have hydro, but they have always had good clean, water – until now.

Lusk believes there will be a lasting “stigma” associated with these water wells since pile driving began to build the North Kent Wind farm, being developed by Korean industrial giant Samsung and its U.S. partner Pattern Energy.

“It’s beyond wrong, it’s criminal,” Lusk said, referring to the fact the wind developer continues to put up turbines after stating publicly that the pile driving is not causing the problems with the wells.

“We’ve said this is what’s going to happen, this is what’s happening, and they still don’t acknowledge that the pile driving is causing this damage,” he said. “You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.”

Bill Clarke, a retired hydrogeologist with 40 years experience, said, “I never seen anything like this before.”

He noted with the difficulties being seen with this many water wells, “why isn’t somebody not putting the brakes on and stopping and taking the time to notice what is taking place?”

Clarke, who has been working with Water Wells First to conduct well testing, is particularly puzzled there hasn’t been any action from the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change.

He said some people are experiencing well interference by the clear definition of the Ontario Water Resources Act, Reg. 903.

“If you can’t get water from your well, and that’s a change from what it was so many months ago, is that not interference?” he asked.

Having worked for clients who had quarries and gravel pits where blasting took place, Clarke said if this activity impacted a well, “the ramifications would be instant, the corrections procedures would be instant.”

He added in this area, there seems to be no recognition that people’s wells are experiencing interference from a particulate point of view.

In all the cases he has been involved with, Clarke said the quarry already had a program in place through a citizens’ advisory committee to hear complaints immediately.

He added the operator responds immediately, and if they don’t, the MOECC gets involved.

“I’ve never had a client where they don’t act as neighbours in the area to make sure things are put right,” Clarke said.

Source:  Retired hydrogeologist puzzled at lack of action | By Ellwood Shreve, Chatham Daily News | Thursday, October 26, 2017 | www.chathamdailynews.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky