[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Judge bans turbine blockades  

Credit:  Wind turbines: Ruling gives cops right to arrest those who violate order | By Ellwood Shreve, Chatham Daily News | Monday, October 2, 2017 | www.chathamdailynews.ca ~~

Chalk one up for Big Wind.

Korean industrial giant Samsung and an American partner won a court ruling Monday that bans blockades by protesters or other interference in the construction of a 100-megawatt wind farm in north Chatham-Kent.

The injunction ruling, in a region where wind farms are deeply polarizing, made clear protesters can go only so far fighting the energy projects that have drawn flak from many across the region, including some municipalities that have declared they don’t want them.

In delivering his ruling, banning any trespassing on the site or attempts to block its construction, Ontario Superior Court Justice Kirk Munroe said repeated summer protests over the Dresden-area project, which included blocking some entrances to tower construction sites, were a major factor in his decision.

“That run of escalating protests culminated in a total takeover of one of the construction sites for many days,” Munroe said.

The 11-day occupation of the site led to an interim injunction in early September banning anyone from blockading, obstructing or impeding access to the North Kent Wind project, a joint venture of Samsung and U.S.-based Pattern Energy.

“I cannot ignore that this is a protest which has not ended. It has maintained its vigour and continues with the goal of ending the construction of the project,” the judge said, adding he’s not trying to “muzzle” the project’s opponents, but only to “prohibit unlawful acts.”

Ground Zero for industrial wind turbines, Southwestern Ontario is home to the province’s largest wind farms and largest number of towers. Activists opposed to their construction have waged political and other battles against wind farms, including questioning their fallout on human health.

Monday’s ruling – involving protesters fearful that pile-driving from the North Kent Wind Project is damaging their water wells – appeared to draw a line that can’t be crossed for the projects.

North Kent Wind had sought the injunction against Water Wells First, a citizens’ group, and Cindy Soney of Walpole Island First Nation.

Water Wells First spokesperson Kevin Jakubec said later lawful protests will continue near turbine sites and at area Environment Ministry offices. A class-action lawsuit may be a possibility, he added.

He said there’s a hesitancy to take on large wind energy firms with deep pockets. “Absolutely, there’s that feeling of intimidation from a big multinational, like Samsung,” he said.

The company said in a statement it respects citizens’ rights to be heard, but protesters’ activity had escalated to point where the company believed it could not continue to operate safely.

Jakubec’s lawyer, Mark MacKew, said his client plans to focus on science instead of legal battles, since it appears well owners will have to prove the project is damaging their water wells.

“Oddly enough, it looks like it’s contingent upon the water well owners to prove this is more than coincidence, they have to prove causation,” he said.

Source:  Wind turbines: Ruling gives cops right to arrest those who violate order | By Ellwood Shreve, Chatham Daily News | Monday, October 2, 2017 | www.chathamdailynews.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.