[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fresh wind farm plans for Barrel Law  

Credit:  David Knox, News Editor | Border Telegraph | www.bordertelegraph.com ~~

Wind farm developers are hoping a fresh bid for a site near Ashkirk will fly beneath the radar this time.

An initial application for Barrel Law was turned down by Scottish Borders Council due to fears the eight turbines would interfere with RAF detection systems.

The Ministry of Defence’s objection on grounds of possible interference with radar at RAF Spadeadam and seismic monitoring at Eskdalemuir was upheld by planners.

An appeal by ABO Wind UK was later turned down by the Scottish government.

The developer has now returned with another application for the site, which lies four miles south west of Ashkirk and just over two miles north-west of Roberton.

The seven proposed turbines have a total generation capacity of up to 24.5 Megawatts (MW) and a blade tip height of up to 132 metres.

Clark Crosbie, head of development for ABO Wind UK said: “The site is located well outside the area being discussed for a proposed Borders National Park.

“In addition, the site has good wind resource, a readily available electricity grid connection and is relatively isolated from houses.”

In their application ABO Wind state that the fresh application differs from the original, with the number of turbines reduced from eight to seven and the turbine cluster being moved further north towards Langhope Rig Wind Farm.

The planning application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement reporting the detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken which assesses the potential effects of the wind farm including on landscape and visual amenity, ornithology, ecology, traffic, cultural heritage, geology, hydrology, tourism and recreation.

Planners will consider the application over the coming months.

Source:  David Knox, News Editor | Border Telegraph | www.bordertelegraph.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.