[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Senator seeks to ease wind setback rules  

Credit:  By Jim Provance, Blade Columbus Bureau Chief | The Blade | Sept. 14, 2017 | www.toledoblade.com ~~

COLUMBUS – Arguing that Ohio is losing millions in potential business investment, state Sen. Cliff Hite (R., Findlay) introduced a bill Thursday to loosen property setback restrictions imposed three years ago on the siting of new wind farms.

“We’re trying to make this so that those who want wind projects can [move forward],” Mr. Hite said. “Right now they’re handcuffed by the language that exists. I know some people don’t want projects, but this bill is a compromise between where we used to be and where we are now.”

In 2014, lawmakers passed and Gov. John Kasich signed a provision imposing the tighter restrictions. The wind industry and some lawmakers, including some from northwest Ohio which have benefited economically from wind farms, have been trying ever since to ease those restrictions.

Previous law required 1,125 feet between the extended tip of a wind turbine and the nearest home, essentially 1,300 feet from the tower when factoring in the length of the turbine. It also provided for a setback from the nearest property line of 1.1 of the tower’s height, which presumes that if the tower were to fall, it would not cross the property line.

But some neighbors of wind farms have argued that the closer proximity of the wind turbines – with noise, light reflection, and shadow – can amount to a de facto taking of their property even if the turbine itself does not cross their land.

The 2014 restriction changed the rules to 1,225 feet from the property line, not the nearest residence – a move that wind farm developers argue leads to fewer turbines per property, making such operations economically infeasible.

No new wind farm applications have been filed with the Ohio Power Siting Board since. Mr. Hite said some projects already approved before the stricter rules took effect would like to take advantage of new technology developed in recent years, but they fear that changing the projects’ designs now would open them to the tighter restrictions.

After his attempts to address the issue in the recently enacted budget failed, Mr. Hite’s new bill would move closer to the original standard—1.2 of the tower’s height from the property line and 1,225 feet between the tip of the extended blade to the closest dwelling, or about 1,400 feet counting the blade’s length.

He held a press conference with Hardin County business leaders at the construction site of the proposed Hog Creek Wind Farm in rural Dunkirk in hopes of building support. The project was under way before the 2014 restrictions were imposed and is expected to create a peak of 235 construction jobs and seven permanent jobs when completed.

A variation of Mr. Hite’s latest language was included in the Senate’s first pass at a state budget in June, but it was removed in the House and ultimately did not reach Mr. Kasich’s desk.

Mr. Hite said he has 14 co-sponsors in the 33-member chamber this time, two of them in leadership. He also has resolutions passed in Paulding, Putnam, Sandusky, and Seneca counties in support of the language.

“It’s high time we fix this issue once and for all, and reopen Ohio’s doors to wind energy companies that are eager to invest in the Buckeye state,” said Trish Demeter, vice president of policy at the Ohio Environmental Council: “Without a fix, Ohio will continue to fall further and further behind in the clean energy era.”

Source:  By Jim Provance, Blade Columbus Bureau Chief | The Blade | Sept. 14, 2017 | www.toledoblade.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.