[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Judge: Wind turbines are a nuisance  

Credit:  News-Press | Sept. 9, 2017 | www.newspressnow.com ~~

Recently, a newspaper in Falmouth, Massachusetts, reported a decision by a Massachusetts Superior Court Judge in a case where he granted relief after listening to the arguments that operation of two wind turbines constituted a nuisance. While several other lawsuits involving “complaints of excessive noise, harmful health effects, drops in property values and officials failing to follow proper rules as they allowed projects to move forward” have been reported and would make interesting reading to your readers, Judge Moriarity II established a definition of “nuisance” for this case between a town and its Zoning Board of Appeals.

“Injurious” and “nuisance” are words often found in by-laws and ordinances. The article provided numerous cases discussing meanings of words, injurious, unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of the property of another, locality, everyday life, financial benefit, harm or risk, noise as a nuisance, and the number of people concerned by the noise and the magnitude of the industry named in the complaint. Reviewing all the reasons expressed in each of the cases referenced, Judge Moriarity II concluded that the operation of the wind turbines and the consequent sound emissions constitute an unreasonable interference with the complainant’s enjoyment of their property, and constitute a nuisance.

The Zoning Board of Appeals had ordered the Building Commissioner to take whatever steps were necessary to eliminate the nuisance. The judge concluded the appropriate remedy was the immediate cessation of the operation of the turbines. He decided the Zoning Board of Appeals should be affirmed to the extent the operation of these two wind towers constituted a nuisance, and ordered the town cease and desist the operation of the wind turbines forthwith.

Glenn Dyer

Stewartsville, Missouri

Source:  News-Press | Sept. 9, 2017 | www.newspressnow.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.