[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

The ‘fix’  

Credit:  The Daily Reporter | September 6, 2017 | www.spencerdailyreporter.com ~~

Is the “fix” in? For several months, many of us in Clay County have been trying to convince the board of supervisors to set reasonable distances away from other peoples property since Apex started soliciting easements luring landowners to sign easements waving $10,000 per wind turbine as an inducement. This, of course, would be unnecessary if they had checked with the neighbors before signing the easement.

After receiving almost nothing after a couple of meetings with the supervisors, we decided to follow the process Apex must follow to get final approval for the project. First stop was the Planning and Zoning Commission where Apex put on their “dog and pony show” followed by comments from the audience. A motion was made to approve and the vote was 3 for and 3 against which meant the chairman would break the tie. We could not believe the chairman then announced he was abstaining! He was the only member who lived in the area of the proposed wind farm and had signed a petition against it. A subsequent motion was made and it passed 4-2 because one of those opposed changed her mind.

Soon it became public knowledge the reason the chairman abstained was the county attorney had told him he couldn’t vote because he had a “vested interest!” Vested interest? Is it a “vested interest” to try and protect your property from the ravages of those whirling, twirling noisy monstrosities of plastic and steel forever destroying the tranquility and beauty of our rural landscape?

Red flags started waving begging the question why? Is this a function of the county attorney? Is it in their handbook to take “sides?” Or, which is more likely, did some person or organization such as Apex “suggest” it to her?

If this is acceptable, does this mean the county attorney will tell supervisors Anderson and Matthews they must abstain from voting because they have made no apologies voicing their support of the wind farm? Kinda doubtful!

Something is “rotten in Denmark?” Who will investigate the legality? The county attorney? I’ll answer my initial question. Yes, the fix is in!

— Jerry Crew, Webb

Source:  The Daily Reporter | September 6, 2017 | www.spencerdailyreporter.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter