[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm files to dismiss review of WECS ordinance 

Credit:  By Travis Weik | The Courier-Times | August 30, 2017 | www.thecouriertimes.com ~~

A group of Henry County residents who are challenging local wind turbine rules have until the middle of September to respond to a ‘motion to dismiss’ filed by Big Blue River Wind Farm LLC.

Petitioners from Middletown, Straughn, New Castle, Shirley, Spiceland, Mooreland, Sulphur Springs and Hagerstown asked the local courts in May to review the Henry County Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) ordinance.

The filings claimed that the WECS ordinance is invalid because the Henry County Planning Commission didn’t provide proper notice in 2009 before they added the new rules to the county development code. The claim also raised questions of whether the planning commission has the legal authority to issue commission-approved uses (CAUs) to projects around the county.

The case is being heard in Henry Circuit Court 1 by Special Judge Linda Ralu Wolf from Delaware County.

Within their defensive arguments, the Henry County Planning Commission and the Henry County Commissioners responded that, among other things, the petitioners waited too long to challenge the ordinances.

Big Blue River Wind Farm’s lawyers told the court that the claim should fail because the petitioners “wholly failed to act within a reasonable period of time.” This is a legal concept known as the doctrine of laches.

“Here, Petitioners waited for almost eight (8) years before deciding that the 2009 Amendment was improper and almost fifteen (15) years to challenge the authority of the Plan Commission and the concept of Commission Approved Uses,” the attorneys said.

According to the rebuttal, the law presumes that all the petitioners knew about the WECS ordinance. Big Blue River Wind Farm argues that everyone now challenging the ordinance “knowingly acquiesced in its application since its inception.”

The company’s lawyers also pointed out that the Henry County Planning Commission has been issuing CAUs since 2002.

Any findings that declare the WECS ordinance or the CAU process invalid “could potentially unravel eight years of wind and other decision, resulting in extreme prejudice to the Plan Commission and third parties pursuing those projects in Henry County,” the attorneys stated.

Arguing against the claim that no proper notice was given in 2009, the wind company’s legal team said the specific public notice announcing discussions about the WECS ordinance was published alongside multiple other planning commission ads that contained the date and time of the meeting.

The county and Big Blue River Wind Farm also claimed that the petitioners had failed to “exhaust all administrative remedies” by requesting a judicial review of the county’s WECS ordinance.

The wind farm’s attorneys said the proper procedure for challenging the legality of an ordinance is to file a “declaratory judgment action” against the legislative body that adopted the ordinance.

The Henry County Planning Commission cannot take any action to amend the current WECS ordinance until the lawsuit is resolved.

Source:  By Travis Weik | The Courier-Times | August 30, 2017 | www.thecouriertimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon