[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Scottish wind farm refused over aviation concerns  

Credit:  29 August 2017 by Winnie Agbonlahor | www.planningresource.co.uk ~~

A council in Scotland has refused planning permission for a nine-turbine wind farm after planners warned that the scheme could pose a risk to aviation.

Developer Brookfield Renewable UK Limited had applied to East Ayrshire Council for permission to build nine 100-metre high wind turbines on a 468-hectare site at Drogan, south of Sinclairston and east of Rankinston.

National Air Traffic Services (NATS) lodged an objection to the scheme over concerns that the turbines could interfere with local air traffic control radars, which, planning officers said in their report, Brookfield had not addressed sufficiently.

According to the report, Brookfield argued that the council should approve the wind farm with a planning condition to ensure that no development would take place until an appropriate aviation mitigation solution had been implemented.

However, planners argued that it seemed unlikely such a solution would be found given the applicant has had more than two years to work on mitigation measures.

“The council has been reasonable to the applicant and has, twice now, delayed taking the application to planning committee for determination,” the report said.

An update with mitigation proposals provided by Brookfield on 26 July, the report added, were “not sufficiently mature to provide NATS with any confidence of their suitability and potential for eventual implementation.”

Planners acknowledged that the majority of material considerations are “supportive of the development,” which would would bring economic benefits and “directly help tackle climate change”.

But officers concluded that the scheme would be contrary to government policy and the area’s development plan “given the outstanding aviation objection from NATS due to the lack of mitigation solutions to address the aviation impacts of the proposed development”.

Source:  29 August 2017 by Winnie Agbonlahor | www.planningresource.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.