[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind project’s impact on roads concerns residents  

Credit:  By Elliot Ferguson, Kingston Whig-Standard | Friday, August 4, 2017 | www.thewhig.com ~~

The group opposed to a wind energy project on Amherst Island continues its opposition at the municipal level.

In a 14-page letter to Loyalist Township councillors, Michele Le Lay, president of the Association to Protect Amherst Island, outlined the group’s concerns about the impact on the island’s roads.

The project’s operations plan is currently before council after a vote to approve the plan was deferred earlier this summer. In response, the company asked for an arbitration hearing, set for the middle of August.

APAI’s concern about the operations plan is in a proposal to reconstruct or widen approximately 20 kilometres of island roads, something the group said was not included in the project’s plan when the provincial government gave the plan conditional approval almost two years ago.

“APAI reiterates that the Association is adamantly opposed to the proposed Amherst Island Wind Turbine Project and nothing in this submission reflects support for Island industrialization,” Le Lay wrote.

South Shore Road resident Martin Hauschild is also taking the township to court at the end of August.

Hauschild said that because the road in front of his house was built on land he owns, neither the township nor the company can build part of the project on that land.

Le Lay included six changes the group would like to see to the plan before council votes on it, changes Le Lay said are needed to protect the island’s residents and the environment.

“APAI encourages Council to heed this cautionary tale and to ensure that every detail of the Operations Plan is nailed tight,” Le Lay wrote. “Settling on the ‘best we could get’ will not protect the public interest and will not enable enforcement and clear accountability for monitoring and timely preventative and remedial action.”

Source:  By Elliot Ferguson, Kingston Whig-Standard | Friday, August 4, 2017 | www.thewhig.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch