LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Javid refuses 11-turbine Cornwall wind farm 

Credit:  27 July 2017 by Winnie Agbonlahor | Planning Resource | www.planningresource.co.uk ~~

Communities secretary Sajid Javid has refused an application for a wind farm in Cornwall after agreeing with an inspector that the scheme’s ‘extensive and weighty’ benefits would not outweigh harm to heritage assets and it would breach local planning policy.

Good Energy Generation Ltd had its application for up to 11 turbines on land at Creddacott Farm, near the village of Week St Mary, rejected by Cornwall Council in 2014 and appealed the decision.

The appeal was recovered by the then communities secretary Greg Clark in July 2015. Yesterday his successor, Sajid Javid, ruled in favour of the council’s decision.

The decision letter said Javid agreed with the inspector’s advice that “the public benefits of the proposal are insufficient to justify the harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets that would be caused”.

The letter said that Javid agreed with the inspector that the wind farm would breach three policies in the Cornwall Local Plan on renewable energy and the preservation of the county’s natural environment, as well as one local plan policy saved from the 1999 North Cornwall Local Plan aimed at protecting the countryside and landscape character.

Javid acknowledged that the scheme would “help combat climate change”, could “act as a model for other renewable energy projects” and promised “extensive and weighty” benefits. However, he concluded that planning permission should be refused.

The wind turbines, the letter said, “would be an incongruous presence of significant scale”. It also referred to the written ministerial statement from June 2015 requiring plans for wind turbines to only be approved if they have community backing.

Javid agreed with the inspector that “the planning impacts identified by affected local communities have not been addressed and, as a result, the proposal does not have the backing of the local community”.

Source:  27 July 2017 by Winnie Agbonlahor | Planning Resource | www.planningresource.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon