LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Falmouth ruling bolsters cause for neighbors of Plymouth turbines 

Credit:  Ethan Genter | Cape Cod Times | Jul 15, 2017 | www.capecodtimes.com ~~

BOURNE – For neighbors of the Future Generation Wind turbines who have been complaining to town and state officials about the effects of the four 500-foot tall turbines, things have been looking bleak.

They have said the turbines have robbed them of their sleep, their health, and the enjoyment of their property, to no avail.

They failed in their attempt at a preliminary injunction against the ConEdison Solutions-owned turbines. They tried to get the turbines shut down by town boards in both Bourne and Plymouth, but failed. And they have tried in vain to get the state Department of Environmental Protection to conduct sound testing.

But the recent development in Falmouth, where a judge ordered the town’s two wind turbines at the municipal wastewater facility to be powered down because they constitute a nuisance, is a positive development.

“It’s definitely a ray of hope for us,” said Ian Davies of Plymouth, a neighbor of the turbines. Davies was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit filed by a group of private citizens against Future Generation Wind and the town of Bourne.

“I think what it’s done is it’s reinvigorated us,” Davies said. “We feel we now have a fair chance, or good chance, to shut these down.”

Although they say it doesn’t happen all the time, several neighbors have said the turbines can sound like a airplane that’s flying overhead but never lands.

And even though they have hope, the situations are different. The Falmouth turbines were town-owned on town property. The Plymouth turbines are on private property and are owned by a private company. They sit close to the Bourne border, but all of them are located in Plymouth, making it hard for residents of Bourne to fight through their own town government.

The Falmouth Zoning Board of Appeals also ruled that the turbines in their town were a nuisance, something that neither Plymouth nor Bourne has done. The Bourne Board of Health filed a lawsuit against Future Generation Wind, claiming that the turbines must adhere to Bourne’s bylaws, but that suit was rejected by a judge in Barnstable Superior Court.

“We need one of the towns’ entities to document the nuisance,” said Karen Gibides of Buzzards Bay, one of the closest neighbors to the turbines. Fighting ConEdison, instead of a town, is a monumental task, she said, and many don’t have resources for a long legal battle. “It’s an awfully big nut to crack.”

But that hasn’t doused the confidence of Larry McGrath, an attorney and neighbor of the Plymouth turbines.

“We are certainly heartened by Judge Moriarty’s ruling,” he said. “If the Falmouth ones are a nuisance, these are certainly a nuisance.”

But these things don’t happen overnight, Davies pointed out, and the Buzzards Bay Citizens Action Committee – as the Bourne neighbors have dubbed themselves – don’t plan to give up.

“It took (the Falmouth neighbors) seven years,” Davies said. “We’re going to continue what we have to do.”

The turbines are currently undergoing sound testing as a condition of the special permit under which they approved. That testing may continue into the fall, depending on weather conditions, a DEP spokesman said.

The Buzzards Bay Citizens Action Committee is scheduled to meet later this month to plan how to continue their fight.

ConEdison has maintained that the company has met all of the guidelines set forth by the town of Plymouth, but declined to comment for this story.

Source:  Ethan Genter | Cape Cod Times | Jul 15, 2017 | www.capecodtimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky