[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ocean City officials say wind turbines too close to coast an eyesore  

Credit:  Officials believe unsightly structures would hurt tourism, economy | David Collins, Team Reporter | WBAL-TV 11 | Jul 13, 2017 | www.wbaltv.com ~~


Recent approval of two wind farms off the coast of Ocean City is generating concern.

Beach-goers, property owners and elected officials are worried that the distance of the wind farms from shore will change the view.

In Ocean City, the beach matters. Its 10-mile sandy coast is the No. 1 asset in Maryland’s vacation capital. The quaint town of just more than 7,000 welcomes 345,000 visitors each summer.

Hotels, condominiums, clubs, bars and restaurants exist because of beach-goers. Ocean City tourism generates $150 million each year in tax revenues for the state.

But change as significant as the constant offshore breeze is literally on the horizon.

“It’s an epic moment for Maryland to cement the U.S. offshore wind industry in the state, (to) create thousands of jobs for multiple generations,” said Paul Rich, director of project development for U.S. Wind.

The Maryland Public Service Commission gave U.S. Wind permission to build up to 187 wind turbines off the coast of Ocean City. A 750-megawatt offshore power plant is set to open in 2020.

“This is going to provide enough electricity for 500,000 homes,” Rich said.

Electric cables will be buried 6-8 feet under the ocean floor and connect to the grid at a coal-fired plant in Dagsboro, Delaware, eventually replacing coal. It will cost rate-payers 97 cents a month to subsidize the $1.4 billion project.

The turbines are 60 stories tall, which is 50 feet higher than the Washington Monument.
wind turbines Ocean City rendering

Nearly everyone said they like the idea of a clean, renewable energy source. The problem is that they don’t want to see it.

“Our big concern is visual pollution,” Ocean City Mayor Rick Meehan said.

Meehan contends that 12 miles is too close and that an acceptable distance is 26 miles.

“We want them to be moved back to the horizon, so we don’t see the towers. I really believe people come to Ocean City because they want to look out into the ocean, the undisturbed natural state of the ocean, and this will dramatically change that,” Meehan said.

There are mixed opinions from tourists.

“It would take away from the view and the beauty of this beach,” said Marvin McDowell, of Washington, D.C.

“It won’t really ruin the view of the beach. I mean, if it’s out far enough, and to me I think it is pretty with the spinning,” said Sarah Bryant, of New Jersey.

“It would kind of ruin the serenity of it, you know,” said visitor Terry Morrison, of West Virginia.

The PSC attached nearly 30 conditions to the project, including requiring manufacturing in Maryland. U.S. Wind will build the turbines on the former site of the Sparrows Point Steel Mill, creating thousands of jobs.

But the wind farm distance from shore remains a sticking point.

“Since we started about 12 miles off the coast, just an initial response to the city and listening to their concerns, we were able to engineer the wind farm to be an additional five miles further east,” Rich said.

That puts the wind farm 17 miles from shore.
Ocean City beach

Ocean City Councilman Tony Deluca agrees with the mayor, saying 26 miles off shore is the magic number and they will push that during the federal permit process. One of the federal officials’ criteria requires that the farm does not hurt existing tourism.

“I really think that it’s going to hurt tourism. I think it’s going to hurt property values,” Deluca said.

Officials only have one opportunity to get it right, and they want to do what’s best for the resort town.

Another company, Skipjack Offshore Wind, plans to construct 15 wind turbines. They would be located at the northern end of Ocean City, at least 17 to 21 miles off the coast. The company hopes to begin operation by 2022.

Skipjack and U.S. Wind projects must meet federal approval.

Source:  Officials believe unsightly structures would hurt tourism, economy | David Collins, Team Reporter | WBAL-TV 11 | Jul 13, 2017 | www.wbaltv.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.