[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm moratorium blows through Senate 

Credit:  Four-year wind energy moratorium blows through NC Senate | By Laura Leslie | WRAL | June 28, 2017 | www.wral.com ~~

Raleigh, N.C. – The Senate approved a bill Wednesday that would stop all wind energy projects in the state for four years, despite an impassioned plea from the senator whose district will pay a steep price for the moratorium.

The controversial amendment was added by Senate Majority Leader Harry Brown to House Bill 589, a solar energy policy update that was carefully negotiated among stakeholders and strongly supported by House Speaker Tim Moore.

Brown said the moratorium through the end of 2020 would give a consultant time to determine where wind farms might conflict with training areas for military aircraft.

The moratorium would block two projects already in development, Alligator River in Tyrrell County and Timbermill Wind in Chowan and Perquimans counties. Both are in the economically disadvantaged district of Sen. Erica Smith-Ingram, D-Northampton, who argued that both have already been approved by the Department of Defense under the state’s 2013 regulations governing wind development.

Smith-Ingram read from a recent Joint Land Use Study report that shows the DOD studied and approved the two projects as of no concern to Seymour Johnson Air Force Base or Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point.

“That work has been completed, and it’s emphatically clear – the military has in fact given approval,” she said. “Zero square miles of training route is affected.”

Smith-Ingram said the developers have had permits in place for the last three years and have invested millions of dollars already.

“[That’s] $1 billion of impact that is lost with this wind moratorium,” she told the Senate. “To have this financial impact in my district is absolutely unconscionable.

“They are zero threat to BRAC,” she pleaded, referring to the DOD’s base-closure process. “Please, sir, consider that.”

But Republicans dismissed the study as unreliable and argued any wind farms could hurt the state’s chances in the next round of base closures.

The military is “very careful not to offend anyone in the civilian community. They’re also careful to guard against unnecessary ill will,” said Sen. Ron Rabin, R-Harnett, “They’re unwilling to tell you the real conditions under which BRAC things happen.”

Rabin urged senators to “not worry about all the reports and all the data. Go intuitive this time.”

“Administrations have changed. People retire. BRAC comes back up,” warned Sen. Tommy Tucker, R-Union. “Last time I checked, the military was a $30 billion industry to this state.”

“Let’s take a step back, do the study, see where [wind] works and where it doesn’t work. It gets us out of the issue,” argued Brown, R-Onslow. “For the life of me, I don’t understand why this is so difficult. Why would you take that chance?”

Brown was one of 10 GOP lawmakers who signed a January letter to the Department of Homeland Security, criticizing the DOD’s approval of Amazon’s wind farm in Pasquotank and Perquimans counties and asking incoming DHS Secretary John Kelly to shut the facility down. The agency has taken no steps thus far to do so.

The Senate vote was 33-12. The House voted not to agree to the Senate’s changes, sending the measure to a conference committee to work out a deal. That may or may not happen before lawmakers adjourn the regular session later this week.

Source:  Four-year wind energy moratorium blows through NC Senate | By Laura Leslie | WRAL | June 28, 2017 | www.wral.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon