[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Single turbine sought for wind farm  

Credit:  By Kay Sinclair | Otago Daily Times | 27 June 2017 | www.odt.co.nz ~~

The backers of a plan for a wind farm near Blueskin Bay are now arguing for one turbine, not three, on Porteous Hill north of Dunedin.

The Dunedin City Council resource consent committee last year declined consent for three 90m wind turbines on the hill.

That decision is being appealed by Blueskin Energy Limited.

At an Environment Court hearing in Dunedin today, one of the lawyers representing Blueskin Energy told Judge Jane Borthwick the proponents of the wind farm were now asking for only one turbine, but slightly larger at 110m, instead of the three 90m turbines proposed earlier.

Refusing consent last year, consent committee commissioner Colin Weatherall said his decision was ”significantly influenced” by the adverse effects the wind farm would have on the amenity and character of Pryde Rd properties.

Blueskin Energy in its appeal argues the consent committee erred on several issues, including determining the turbines would be intrusive and visually dominant over the properties, that the noise of the turbines would reinforce that dominance,and in not granting consent for the two turbines it considered acceptable.

Bridget Irving told the court the one turbine now proposed would be at least 650m away from the nearest house. The earlier proposal had one of the turbines at 471m distance from the nearest house.

At 650m distance, the noise from the one turbine would be no more than minor, Ms Irving said.

Source:  By Kay Sinclair | Otago Daily Times | 27 June 2017 | www.odt.co.nz

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.