[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Billboard campaign calls on Gov. Cuomo to protect Falls air base  

Credit:  By Kevin Keenan of Keenan Communications Group | Niagara Frontier Publications | Jun 22nd, 2017 | www.wnypapers.com ~~

The message to Gov. Andrew C. Cuomo is loud and clear: “Don’t let Apex gamble with our air base.”
Purchased by Save Ontario Shores, billboards featuring a massive industrial wind turbine and an Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker are posted near the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, Niagara County’s largest employer.
Virginia-based Apex Clean Energy has proposed construction of as many as 70 industrial wind turbines in the towns of Somerset and Yates in Niagara and Orleans counties. The massive turbines would reportedly be more than 620 feet tall, making them the tallest turbines on land in the U.S., and the highest structures in New York state outside of New York City.
Residents and property owners who make up SOS share a deep appreciation for the unspoiled beauty of Somerset and Yates and the shoreline of Lake Ontario; their goal is to protect the rural environment and wildlife, the economy and its citizens, by opposing the industrial wind turbine project.
Surveys show most residents are opposed to the construction of the wind turbines.
“We know military officials are pushing for another base realignment and closure (BRAC) process, and the presence of these massive structures so close to the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station could eliminate its current encroachment-free status, placing the base at risk,” said Pamela Atwater, SOS president.
In two previous BRACs, NFARS had been scheduled for closure, only to receive an 11th-hour reprieve.
Atwater noted earlier BRACs have resulted in the closing of seven other military installations in New York.
“I’m sure Gov. Cuomo does not want to see any base closures on his watch,” Atwater said. “We urge him to ask Apex to withdraw its lighthouse wind proposal to protect NFARS, its 2,600 jobs and $200 million annual economic impact on Western New York.”
Fort Drum, a U.S. Army post near Watertown, is confronting the same situation. Apex has proposed 30 industrial wind turbines towering to nearly 600 feet in that rural area of New York.
Julie A. Halpin, a spokeswoman for Fort Drum, told the Watertown Daily Times the proposed Apex project “would have an impact on radar as it increases the clutter on the scope.”
She also said the industrial wind turbines could have a negative impact on aircraft instrument approaches to Fort Drum and to its air traffic control services.
Legislation limiting construction of industrial wind turbines near U.S. military installations is currently being considered in Albany and Washington.
New York State Congressman Chris Collins introduced the “Protection of Military Airfields from Wind Turbine Encroachment Act” to ensure any new wind turbines located within a 40-mile radius of a military installation would be deemed ineligible for renewable energy tax credits. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas has proposed a companion bill in the U.S. Senate.
Sen. Rob Ortt of North Tonawanda has introduced comparable legislation in New York.
In Texas, the legislature approved a bill to eliminate tax abatements for wind turbines sited within 25 miles of military bases over concerns they pose a safety risk to bases with aviation operations. State lawmakers in North Carolina and Virginia have also expressed concerns regarding the proximity of industrial wind turbine plants to military installations.

Source:  By Kevin Keenan of Keenan Communications Group | Niagara Frontier Publications | Jun 22nd, 2017 | www.wnypapers.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.