[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

D.C. Circuit backs grid rules accused of hurting wind, solar 

Credit:  Amanda Reilly, E&E News reporter | Published: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 | www.eenews.net ~~

A federal court today unanimously upheld regulators’ approval of a new electricity market structure in the eastern half of the country.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected environmentalists’ arguments that the framework discriminates against intermittent sources of energy such as wind and solar.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission made a “policy judgment” about the performance the market requires, “not an undue privileging of one resource’s costs over another’s,” the court found.

Senior Judges David Sentelle and A. Raymond Randolph and Judge Janice Rogers Brown – all Republican appointees – issued the ruling.

At issue was the 2015 FERC decision to approve PJM Interconnection’s new performance requirements for suppliers that want to participate in annual electric capacity auctions.

PJM is an electric transmission service in 13 Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern states and Washington, D.C. It operates an energy capacity market to ensure grid reliability.

Every year, PJM conducts an auction to provide capacity three years in advance. In a typical auction, producers offer a specific amount of capacity at a specific price. Those with the lowest prices clear auction first, and PJM continues the process until its forecast demand is met.

After the polar vortex – the particularly cold spell along the East Coast in the winter of 2014 – PJM eyed reforms to improve reliability, as well as a broader overhaul of its capacity market.

Under the rule changes, producers that fail to provide continuous capacity must pay penalties. PJM began phasing in the changes after it received FERC’s conditional approval.

But national environmental groups argued that the rules were unfair to seasonal renewable energy resources that didn’t maintain constant output.

And although PJM allowed seasonal resources to aggregate, they argued that the constraints PJM placed on such aggregation “effectively eliminate the usefulness of this provision.”

A trade group that represents demand-response providers, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, and various power associations also filed petitions seeking court review of FERC’s decision (Greenwire, Feb. 14).

In the unanimous decision today, the D.C. Circuit rejected all the claims, finding that the commission adequately explained why it approved the structure and that it acted in a just and reasonable way.

“None of these challenges overcome the deferential standard of review afforded the commission’s determinations,” the court found.

The Natural Resources Defense Council, which was among the environmental groups that argued the rules were unfair, expressed disappointment in the decision, calling it a “real setback for cleaner air and lower customer bills.”

“These rules restrict market competition largely to fossil and nuclear power plants,” NRDC attorney Jennifer Chen said, “and inhibit the electric grid from becoming more flexible, economical, and reliable through integrating more pollution-free wind and solar power and also demand response, which compensates volunteers to cut electricity use when the grid is stressed.”

Click here to read the ruling.

Source:  Amanda Reilly, E&E News reporter | Published: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 | www.eenews.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon