[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Don’t be too quick to praise California and New York for their clean-energy policies  

Credit:  The Washington Post | June 13 | www.washingtonpost.com ~~

The June 4 editorial “What states can do on climate change” praised New York and California for their clean-energy policies. California leads all states in the importation of electricity; New York ranks high. California’s forced closing of the San Onofre nuclear plant removed a large source of in-state generation, and New York’s forced closing of the two nuclear reactors at Indian Point (scheduled for mid-2021) will do the same for it. When a state imports electricity, it avoids the air pollution associated with its manufacture.

Both states have hopped on the bandwagon of renewables, which usually means wind and solar. Neither state comes close to manufacturing all the wind turbine towers, nacelles and blades it has installed. They import most of those as well. Huge towers and nacelles require making a lot of steel and concrete, both heavy polluting processes. The noxious chemicals and resins released during manufacture of turbine blades remain toxic to the environment for decades. California has one blade-manufacturing plant, near Los Angeles, so its toxins flow either south or into the ocean. Solar-panel manufacturing is another highly polluting process.

California leads the nation in blackouts and brownouts, and it costs the state dearly. New York sits firmly in third place in blackouts and will likely move up to second (no state will overtake California anytime soon) when Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) succeeds in closing Indian Point.

Lin Edgar Moyer, Takoma Park

Source:  The Washington Post | June 13 | www.washingtonpost.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.