[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Future of VT wind power hinges on legislative decision  

Credit:  April McCullum, Free Press Staff Writer | Burlington Free Press | June 9, 2017 | www.burlingtonfreepress.com ~~

MONTPELIER – Supporters of wind power in Vermont are asking a group of state lawmakers to block regulations that would more strictly limit wind turbine noise.

People who are worried about the health impacts of living near wind turbines say the new rules would be a helpful step.

Advocates and opponents of ridgeline wind projects filled a committee room Thursday at the Vermont Statehouse in Montpelier as lawmakers took more than an hour of testimony.

Utility regulators at the Public Service Board have filed the new restrictions on wind projects. The Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules is the final step in the approval process.

Under the proposed rules, noise from large turbines would be limited to 42 dBA during the day and 39 dBA at night; smaller turbines would be limited to 42 dBA.

Previously approved wind projects were held to a standard of 45 dBA, said John Cotter, a lawyer for the Public Service Board.

“Some people found that sound level to be annoying, and we were encouraged to think about the aesthetic impacts of sound levels from wind facilities,” Cotter said.

Developers also would have to build large wind turbines away from local residents by a distance of 10 times the height of the turbine. Residents could sign an agreement to allow closer turbines, and state regulators also could grant a waiver.

Margaret Cheney, a member of the Public Service Board, said the board developed the rules after an unusual set of three public hearings.

“We believe the rule strikes the appropriate balance among the potentially competing concerns of continuing to support the deployment of in-state renewable energy facilities, including wind,” Cheney said, “while avoiding undue sound-related aesthetic effects and public-health impacts.”

Olivia Anderson, an advocate for wind power from Renewable Energy Vermont, brought a map that showed just 0.6 percent of Vermont land would be viable for a wind project under the new rules, preventing new projects.

Anderson asked lawmakers to reject the rules.

“None of Vermont’s existing utility- or community-scale wind projects would have been constructed under this rule,” Anderson said. “So I believe that clearly addresses the question as to whether future projects could or would be constructed under this rule.”

Annette Smith, executive director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment, questioned Anderson’s calculations and pointed to several proposed wind projects that were not included on the Renewable Energy Vermont map.

Smith supports the new rules, which she says would help to protect the health of wind-turbine neighbors and encourage developers to reach out to the local community.

“It is not like transportation noise,” Smith said. “It is a complex source of feelings, sensations – that’s what people describe. It’s not just the audible noise at all. People describe their heart beating in rhythm with the turbines.”

Anderson, the renewable-energy advocate, doubted the stories of health impacts from wind-turbine noise.

“More than 487 gigawatts of wind have been installed around the world,” Anderson said. “We have also had significant installment of wind in Vermont. And I think that if we were facing a health crisis, that would be well-documented at this point. It is not, however.”

Lawmakers postponed a decision on the wind rules until a future meeting, possibly later in June [NWW note: June 22].

Source:  April McCullum, Free Press Staff Writer | Burlington Free Press | June 9, 2017 | www.burlingtonfreepress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

HOME
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter