[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Committee puts off decision on wind project sound standards 

Credit:  By Howard Weiss-Tisman | Vermont Public Radio | June 8, 2017 | vpr.net ~~

After hearing testimony on the Public Service Board’s proposed new sound standards for commercial wind turbines Thursday, the Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules voted to put off making a decision on the controversial new standards.

In a packed hearing room at the Statehouse Thursday, the committee, known as LCAR, heard from members of the Public Service Board, and from witnesses on both sides of the contentious debate, but in the end decided to take more time to study the science behind the sound standards.

It’s LCAR’s job to make sure any new rule doesn’t run afoul of Vermont law, and when state officials go before the committee it’s generally a quick and painless process.

But that’s not the way it went down Thursday.

“This is not an easy one for this panel,” said Democratic Sen. Mark MacDonald, VCAR vice chairman. “There are a lot of questions to be asked both by proponents of wind and opponents to wind that the board needs to clarify or give reassurance for.”

The Public Service Board was asked to establish sound standards for wind turbines, and they surprised people on both sides of the debate by proposing what would be the lowest sound standards in the country.

Supporters of commercial wind say the new rules would effectively stop any future development, because they say it would be almost impossible to build new wind towers that don’t exceed the new rules.

But opponents want LCAR to approve the rules, arguing that the sound standards protect human health.

MacDonald says it’s not LCAR’s job to get into the middle of that fight, but rather to make sure the science is sound, and fair to everyone.

“We have to ask if these rules are being written on noise, or are they being written to deal with people who don’t like wind, and find wind invasive, intrusive, ugly or annoying?” MacDonald said. “The board has to identify one of those things and stick with it. Legislators often write laws that go both ways, but rules aren’t supposed to do that. So it’s challenging.”

The challenge to come up with sound standards has been long and complicated, and the Public Service Board heard hours of testimony from the two sides over the past few months.

The hearing Thursday was one of the last times to make an argument on either side.

Olivia Campbell Andersen, the director of Renewable Energy Vermont, an advocacy group for commercial wind, told the legislative committee to take a hard look at the science in the proposed sound rules.

“We believe that the specific areas of the rule are contrary to legislative intent and arbitrary,” Andersen said. “The 39 [decibel] sound limit is not supported by any documentation in the record regarding impact to public health or annoyance.”

But Vermonters for a Clean Environment Director Annette Smith said that while the rules weren’t perfect, they would do a better job of protecting property owners who might be living near a ridgeline that’s slated for wind development.

“The rule is not beyond the authority of the agency,” said Smith. “Is not arbitrary. Is written in a satisfactory style, does not fail to recognize the substantial economic impact, and the PSB has adhered to the strategy for maximizing public comment.”

The Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules agreed to come back on June 22 to try to make a decision on the sound rules.

Source:  By Howard Weiss-Tisman | Vermont Public Radio | June 8, 2017 | vpr.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon