| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wild Cattle Hill wind farm ‘strengthens’ case for second Basslink
Credit: Rob Inglis | The Examiner | 6 Jun 2017 | www.examiner.com.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The second day of budget estimates yielded a big reveal from Energy Minister Matthew Groom, as a $300 million renewable energy project in the Central Highlands was announced.
After the Minister had finished sparring with Labor and the Greens in his morning estimates hearing, he detailed the sprawling plan to develop a wind farm at Wild Cattle Hill.
The announcement comes a month after Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull outlined his vision for Tasmania to become the renewable energy “battery of the nation”.
The Wild Cattle Hill development is being undertaken by Goldwind, a Chinese wind power company.
Having reached an in-principle agreement with government-owned electricity retailer Aurora Tasmania, Goldwind will oversee the construction of a 49 turbine wind farm facility.
Mr Groom said the construction of the farm would create 150 jobs, and, moreover, 10 ongoing jobs when construction concludes in 2020.
The Wild Cattle Hill facility will generate 144 megawatts, which is said to be enough to power 60,000 Tasmanian households.
Aurora Energy chief executive Rebecca Kardos said the development was a “significant project” for the state.
Mr Groom said the announcement “strengthened” the case for a second interconnector, which would link the Tasmanian energy market to the mainland in the same way the original Basslink cable does.
“I think any further substantial reneweable development in Tasmania strengthens the case for a second interconnector,” he said.
Meanwhile, in the halls of Parliament, the Minister parried offensives from Opposition energy spokesman Scott Bacon and Greens leader Cassy O’Connor, as the 2017-18 state budget was scrutinised.
Mr Bacon pressed the Minister on the government’s response to former Australian Market Energy Commission chairman John Tamblyn’s feasibility study into a potential second Basslink cable.
Dr Tamblyn’s findings stopped short of endorsing another interconnector.
“Why the silence in terms of when the report was released?” Mr Bacon said.
Mr Groom said he “reject[ed] the proposition”.
“I think the work that was done by Dr Tamblyn was very important,” he said.
“[B]ut there are lots of important pieces of work.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=83091 ]
