LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Save seabirds from windfarms 

Credit:  The Herald | 31st May | www.heraldscotland.com ~~

Stuart Young (Letters, May 31) explains how the wishes of communities in Scotland on windfarms can be overruled by the Scottish Government. It seems the Government does not listen to anyone who disagrees with ITS views, even one of the largest wildlife charities, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB).

Four offshore windfarms off the coast of Scotland have just been consented after two court cases. The RSPB took the case to the courts because of the acknowledged harm to internationally protected sea birds. Thousands of gannets, puffins and kittiwakes are predicted to die each year. The Government thought the harm acceptable. The Lord Ordinary accepted the Judicial Review and agreed with the RSPB, but the developer went to a higher court where the case was dismissed. Scotland’s top judge said: “Despite paying lip service to the correct legal test for judicial review, the Lord Ordinary has strayed well beyond the limits of testing the legality of the process and has turned himself into the decision maker following what appears to have been treated as an appeal against the respondent’s decision on the facts.

“He has acted, almost, as if he were the reporter at such an inquiry, as a finder of fact on matters of scientific fact and methodology which whatever the judge’s own particular skills may be, are not within the proper province of a court of review.

“For this reason alone, his decision on this ground cannot be sustained.”

Section 36 windfarm decisions are not made by parliament and are made by unelected public employees and signed off by ministers. There is no appeal system in which the merits of the case can be considered. I always assumed that one could always refer matters to the courts as wildlife and places are protected by environmental laws, but this proves it is not so.

Where is the possibility of challenging the evidence and enforcing environmental protection under current law?

I hope all RSPB members and others will encourage the society to take this matter to the Supreme, and if necessary, the European Court. Anyone who has been on a boat trip to the Bass Rock to see the gannets, puffins, razorbills and many more seabirds will know that it is one of the wonders of the world. We are custodians of 60 per cent of the world’s gannet population and I am ashamed of our Government playing roulette with all these wonderful species.

Celia Hobbs,

Dykeneuk, Peebles Road, Penicuik, Midlothian.

Source:  The Herald | 31st May | www.heraldscotland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon