| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
House OKs limits on wind farms near military bases
Credit: John C. Moritz, USA Today Network Austin Bureau | May 22, 2017 | www.timesrecordnews.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
AUSTIN – Legislation to limit tax incentives to build wind power plants near Texas military aviation facilities cleared the Texas House on Monday, despite determined opposition from conservative property-rights advocates and many Democrats in the state’s urban centers.
“The goal of this bill is simple: It’s to protect aviation military installations from encroachment,” said state Rep. James Frank, R-Wichita Falls, the House sponsor of Senate Bill 277.
Frank touted the legislation, passed 76-65, as a means to safeguard facilities such as Sheppard Air Force Base near Wichita Falls, Dyess AFB near Abilene and the Corpus Christi and Kingsville Naval Air Stations from being included in the next round of base closings and realignments. San Angelo also has Goodfellow Air Force Base nearby.
It would prevent local governments from offering tax breaks and other incentives for projects within 25 miles of affected installations.
But state Rep. Jim Murphy, R-Houston, called the bill an attack on the ability of landowners to maximize the value of their properties and a stiff-arm to firms that want to bring economic vitality to Texas.
“These companies can deploy their assets anywhere in the United States, but they want to come here,” Murphy said. “When you diminish people’s (property) value and limit their ability to make money, it’s a taking.”
Frank pushed back. “You have a property right to make money with a government handout?” he said.
Joining Frank in support of the measure was state Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, who countered assertions that groups like the oil and gas lobby and the Texas Association of Business were working against the bill that has already won Senate approval.
El Paso Democrat Cesar Blanco, who has both wind farms and a major military facilities in his region of the state, called the legislation “a good balance.”
The bill would not affect already-built wind facilities and was amended to allow projects that are pending when the measure would take effect to go forward.
A final procedural vote is expected Tuesday. Because of the House change, the legislation must go back to the Senate, which can either accept it or ask the House to strip it out.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=82924 ]
