[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

DOE: Grassley slams Perry’s grid study as anti-wind  

Credit:  Daniel Cusick, E&E News reporter | Published: Thursday, May 18, 2017 | www.eenews.net ~~

Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley (R), one of the Senate’s most ardent supporters of wind power, openly challenged the value of a forthcoming Energy Department analysis on grid reliability, calling it “a hastily developed study” that “appears geared to undermine the wind energy industry.”

In a letter sent yesterday to Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Grassley said he was concerned that the upcoming report, due in mid-June, “will not be viewed as credible, relevant or worthy of valuable taxpayer resources,” adding that a similar study completed by the Obama administration took two years to complete.

Grassley asked Perry to answer five questions about the study process, including what contractors and sources DOE would rely on to draw its findings, how much the study will cost, and whether the report would be issued in draft form where it could be subject to broader review and comment.

Perry ordered the study last month, saying he shared concerns raised by some in the electricity sector that baseload power plants, especially coal and nuclear plants, were at risk of being underutilized due to a surge in renewable energy flowing onto the grid from wind farms and solar arrays.

In an April 14 memo to DOE Chief of Staff Brian McCormack, Perry said experts are increasingly concerned about the “diminishing diversity of our nation’s electric generation mix and what that could mean for baseload power and grid resilience.”

Renewable energy advocates quickly seized on whether Perry, by ordering the study, was bidding for the fossil and nuclear power sectors, some of whose members fear their plants could become stranded assets if wind and solar achieve a much higher level of grid penetration over the coming years.

President Trump has also pledged to revive the struggling U.S. coal industry, in part by rolling back regulations on coal-fired power plant emissions and abandoning much of the Obama administration’s climate change agenda, which called for a major expansion of wind, solar and other carbon-free electricity.

More recently, clean energy advocates have argued that the Perry-commissioned study could lay the policy groundwork for a congressional repeal of federal subsidies for wind and solar power (Greenwire, May 9).

Those supports, particularly the production tax credit for wind energy and the investment tax credit for solar power, have stimulated billions of dollars of investment in renewable energy projects since the mid-2000s.

Fossil fuel industry groups, such as the National Mining Association, have said the study is “very justified,” adding that “reputable sources have documented the impact that regulations have had on coal and, indirectly, on grid reliability” (E&E News PM, May 17).

Yet lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, including senior GOP members like Grassley, have been stalwart supporters of the tax credits, pointing to the huge economic windfalls states like Iowa, Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas have seen with the surge in wind energy development.

In his letter to Perry, Grassley pointed to Iowa’s success with wind power, noting that more than half of all electricity produced in the state comes from wind turbines, a figure that is projected to rise to 90 percent over the coming years. “Not only is Iowa’s wind resource reliable, it’s also affordable,” Grassley said.

Grassley also pointed to Perry’s tenure as Texas governor, during which he oversaw one of the largest wind energy booms in history, adding, “Surely you have an appreciation for the enormous economic contributions wind energy is already providing in many parts of the country.”

Perry has not responded to much of the criticism aimed at the internal study. But yesterday, a DOE spokeswomen said in an email that the department is “committed to conducting a thorough review – one that relies heavily on the research and institutional knowledge of the Department’s experts from all relevant program offices and National Laboratories.”

The study is being headed by economist Travis Fisher, who previously worked for the conservative Institute for Energy Research, where he argued that federal policies supporting renewable energy were undermining grid reliability due to their intermittency and the need to cycle traditional baseload power plants to accommodate wind and solar.

This story also appears in E&E Daily.

Source:  Daniel Cusick, E&E News reporter | Published: Thursday, May 18, 2017 | www.eenews.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.